Subject:
|
Re: New Lego controller
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 31 May 2005 01:50:40 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
dan miller <danbmil99@yahoo!spamcake!.com>
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
804 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
I've heard rumors Lego may be planning a new Mindstorms product. IMNSHO
something like this would be perfect. Smaller units, more modularity, easy
connectivity between brains. It fits perfectly into the Lego paradigm, and
the technology is finally there to do it economically.
I think the biggest challenge would be the software side. Something like
robolab needs to be modularized, so the parts of the algorithm that should
naturally reside in different hardware components can be automatically
routed there, and so on. On the C/C++/NQC side, you need some sort of
similar multi-process toolchain. Writing code for a new smart component
should be as easy as defining a new function.
-dbm
--- danny staple <orionrobots@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/30/05, dan miller <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote:
> > --- Gabriel Petrut <gpetrut@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > I was bussy the last couple of weeks with this project and is finaly in a
> > > stage
> > > close to completion. So I have made a webpage to share it with you. Please
> > > take
> > > a look and let me know what you think.
> >
> > I think it's way cool. When can I get one (or three?)
> >
> > >
> > > http://www.geocities.com/gpetrut/NemesisForLego.htm
> > >
> > > Gabriel
> >
> >
>
> That is exactly what I was thinking Dan.
>
> This is nice. it is smaller than the RCX, and has an external power
> source. The IR setup will really come in handy. I take it the
> controller is only compatible with passive sensors? Although with the
> Sharp sensors - you have a ncie range of quite advanced sensors.
> When it goes modular, are the slave controllers addressed? Can they
> run off in their own micromode, occasionally using the bus for
> signalling? Is it possible to use the bus to connect two "masters" as
> powerful peers for a more powerful bot?
> I would love to see you get this to market - it would be a real win
> for Lego Robotics.
>
> Orion
> --
> http://orionrobots.co.uk - Build Robots
>
> Online Castle Building RPG -
http://www.darkthrone.com/recruit.dt?uid=V30311I30328J30379X30379E30260X30277
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New Lego controller
|
| (...) Hi Dan, I seem to remember discussing this before. I agree this would be perfect. In terms of software, the system could start out as a simple one module system, and use an interface like robolab or RCX code to start newbies off. When a new (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
29 Messages in This Thread: ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Lego controller -danny staple <orionrobots@gmail.com> (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New Lego controller -Martijn Boogaarts (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Lego controller -Steve Hassenplug (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -Claude Baumann (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good -Steve Hassenplug (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good -Ralph Hempel (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: wireless sensors, and battery life: time synch -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (2-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: wireless sensors, and battery life: time synch -Paul Kleniewski (11-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![more on Zigbee -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: more on Zigbee -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson) (8-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Hopkins) (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: for robots and industry: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good - thanks for response -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (2-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: for robots and industry: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good - thanks for response -John Barnes (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![BT headsets and... -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: for robots and industry: BlueTooth bad, Zigbee good - thanks for response -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Hopkins) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![BT in robotics -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: BT in robotics -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Hopkins) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: BT in robotics -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: BT in robotics -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Hopkins) (5-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: BT in robotics -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (5-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Some BT modules? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Boyes) (3-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Some BT modules? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Bruce Hopkins) (5-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -Martijn Boogaarts (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -Steve Hassenplug (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -danny staple <orionrobots@gmail.com> (31-May-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Lego controller -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Steve Baker) (1-Jun-05 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|