Subject:
|
Re: Service pack 5111 - Wires - no longer available
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:00:37 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Andy Gombos <gombos_2000@earthlink.net[IHateSpam]>
|
Viewed:
|
719 times
|
| |
|
|
I'll care what the voltage is, becuase I have to buy batteries for it/use a
wall wart. Higher voltage == more batteries/more expensive batteries, and
also more space. So, it seems to me (since the RCX/siblings are already
fairly large on a Lego scale), that the voltage can only get lower. I have
not seen the spybotics sets, so I don't know how good they are. However, by
lowering the voltage, you lose backwards compatibility with existing pieces,
assuming a connectiviy plan to hook them together. With a higher voltage, a
2x4 stud brick could lower the voltage to 9V and fix that issue.
I agree with you - the beauty of Lego is the ability to build anything you
want. With 2 motors 180º apart, fixed into position 6 studs apart, the
creative applications are limited. Perhaps then better power transfer
styles ala the flexible axles will be developed.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Baker" <sjbaker1@airmail.net>
To: "Andy Gombos" <gombos_2000@earthlink.net>
Cc: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 12:26 PM
Subject: Re: Service pack 5111 - Wires - no longer available
> Andy Gombos wrote:
>
> > What will they replace it with? 12V? Any other reasonable voltage is • too
> > hard to produce with batteries - 12V is 1 9V and 2 1.5V AAs, or 8 AAs. • That
> > is pathetic, and will increase the size of every electronic component • for
> > the sake of using 12V. Based on what I have heard about 4.5V motors, • they
> > were not terribly powerful. Unless increases in technology have been
> > dramatic, I don't see Lego going lower than 9V.
> >
> > So, where are they going?
>
> Well, if Spybotics is the true harbinger of doom, the future is to put
> the computer, the motors, the batteries and all of the sensors into one
> indivisible lump of plastic.
>
> At this point wires are unnecessary and the end user no longer cares what
> voltage everything runs at because it's all happening inside the one box.
>
> If this happens, I'm off looking for another hobby because that's 180 • degrees
> away from the direction I'd like them to take and it erases *all* of the • fun
> I get from building Lego robots.
>
> ...but we already had *that* discussion.
>
> ----------------------------- Steve Baker -------------------------------
> Mail : <sjbaker1@airmail.net> WorkMail: <sjbaker@link.com>
> URLs : http://www.sjbaker.org
> http://plib.sf.net http://tuxaqfh.sf.net http://tuxkart.sf.net
> http://prettypoly.sf.net http://freeglut.sf.net
> http://toobular.sf.net http://lodestone.sf.net
>
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Service pack 5111 - Wires - no longer available
|
| (...) But the total *energy* stored per battery doesn't change - so if there are more batteries then the time between battery changes will be larger. To at least a first approximation, you'll use the same number of batteries no matter which voltage (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Service pack 5111 - Wires - no longer available
|
| (...) Well, if Spybotics is the true harbinger of doom, the future is to put the computer, the motors, the batteries and all of the sensors into one indivisible lump of plastic. At this point wires are unnecessary and the end user no longer cares (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
