Subject:
|
Re: Posi-trac differential?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 8 Sep 2001 06:47:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2496 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm not sure I follow you here. Even though the 16-tooth gear doesn't mesh
as deeply, it seems to be sufficient to prevent slippage. There is a little
more slop, however.
Note that in my suggestion to move the worm gear shaft to the diagonal, I
may not have been clear in stating that the #2 axle connectors should be
supported in diagonally opposite holes in the 40-tooth gears (though it may
have been obvious to you).
Dennis
In lugnet.robotics, Brian Alano writes:
[snip]
> I looked at moving them to the diagonals, too. I'd be worried about slippage in high-torque situations. 16-tooth gear seems pretty stable already. What about putting another #2 axle connector opposite the first one without fastening it to anything else? It would help with stability in one direction, and the worm gears hold it in the other.
[snip]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Posi-trac differential?
|
| (...) *Very* nice! It's the elegant solution I couldn't conceive. (...) Agreed! (...) I looked at moving them to the diagonals, too. I'd be worried about slippage in high-torque situations. 16-tooth gear seems pretty stable already. What about (...) (23 years ago, 8-Sep-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
