To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 13310
13309  |  13311
Subject: 
motorized points - beating a dead horse
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:03:56 GMT
Viewed: 
40 times
  
Hi All,
Currently I am attempting to build an automated hump yard. The main problem
I'm tackling is the RCX controlled motorized points. I've spent 7 hours over
the last two days trying to build a motorized switch track that will run
forever with out ripping itself off the base plates and be very *forgiving*
at the edges of both states, turn or straight. What I mean by forgiving is
that the motor doesn't burn up or the gears do not get stripped off.

I like really simple and elegant solutions. For instance I would like to be
CPU switched with no feedback, again forgiving at the edges of both states
such that the motor can spin for 1.5 secs and not reap havoc. Hanging
elaborate clutch systems with differentials and angle sensors would not be
my first choice. Of course beggers can't be choosers.

Yes I have tried a bunch of slip gear configurations and the 2.5N/cm doesn't
seem to over come the internal detent.

Yes I looked at several designs on the web, I could have missed something.

After at least 10 iterations I am still staring at a desktop full
of disassembled bricks.

Any ideas? Help?
SteveB
PNLTC



Message has 6 Replies:
  Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
 
"sebarile-MOBL" <steve.e.barile@intel.com> wrote in message news:G4v1EK.6yF@lugnet.com... (...) problem (...) over (...) *forgiving* (...) <snip> (...) If you don't mind a touch-sensor, you could try this one: (URL) automated point sports 1000+ (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
 
(...) (note some heavyhanded snippage) Well, it wouldn't be entirely elegant unless you mounted the mechanics under your substrate, but if you were to gear down the movement so that the white clutch gear had to exert less torque to overcome the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
 
Try putting belt drive stage in your geartrain so it can't destroy things and use touch switches to limit the travel... (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
 
You could try my switch - (URL) out for Lego and Models ... I build this thing using a rubber-band so you can let it run without the switch destroying itself. Just let the motor run a view seconds until the point switches it's position. Michael (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
 
(...) I'm not exactly sure about your setup (I'm not into trains), but how about a small pulley (half bushing) on the motor, driving a medium pulley (with the six holes) on an axle on whose other end is an 8t gear that drives a rack. That setup (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
  Re: motorized points - finally got it!
 
Yippy I finally got it! I have created a motorized switch track that ran 100 switches via RCX without tearing the housing apart or missing firing! After 100 I got tired of counting and I just stopped it, so it might go for several hundred. It sits (...) (24 years ago, 4-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)

22 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR