Subject:
|
Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:06:03 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1191 times
|
| |
|
|
"STEVEBAR" <stevebarile@yahoo.com> wrote...
> Carlo,
> Thanks for the reply! Why use the hinges and 1x2 with rail plate? Is this • to
> strengthen the housing? In my attempts I added a 1x2 plate under the 2 • hole
> 1x6 plate and no 1x4 tile underneth.
> I can't seem to get to the automated yard picture can you reply with a • diect
> link to the picture?
This is a link to the page (sorry, not yet translated to English). Click on
the pictures to enlarge them:
http://www.geocities.com/~marioferrari/itlug_20001001/legofest_6.html
and links to the pictures:
http://www.geocities.com/~marioferrari/itlug_20001001/generale4.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/~marioferrari/itlug_20001001/porto.jpg
> > Mario Ferrari built a sensorless (obviously without feedback) version, • and
> > it still performs fairly well.
I confirm a built a sensor-free version that performed amazingly well. Very
solid, 100% reliable. You have just to properly time your motor not to run
(and stall) longer than necessary.
HTH
Mario
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: motorized points - beating a dead horse
|
| Carlo, Thanks for the reply! Why use the hinges and 1x2 with rail plate? Is this to strengthen the housing? In my attempts I added a 1x2 plate under the 2 hole 1x6 plate and no 1x4 tile underneth. I can't seem to get to the automated yard picture (...) (24 years ago, 1-Dec-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
