 | | Re: Should I lubricate my Lego motor?
|
|
(...) Is this triggered by time or by usage? (i.e. will a motor that is run more wear out faster?) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Should I lubricate my Lego motor?
|
|
(...) You may want to check if your motors are the new type 9V geared motor (#43362). If so, please be aware it is prone to failure, the first sign being sticking. Pl see my previous post on this ailment: (URL) amount of lubrication is going to (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Test - trying to get rid of annoying legal signature
|
|
Sorry for that test. I am just trying to get rid of my company signature by using a web based post service :) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) You should try very high level math... So yes every effort should be made to ease learning but definitel, as others said, one language won't fit everyone needs, because those needs can really be way too different. Laurent -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Wrong :) For two reasons: - a JIT is quite complex if you want to really gain something and requires too much memory (remember the NXT only has 64 KB of RAM); - JIT and real-time are not good friends... On top of that, a carefully implemented (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | NXT + BlueTooth + PC (was: Java Baad)
|
|
Ditto to pretty much everything on this thread. My present robot has a PC running Linux talking to an RCX over IR, using my own (not XML!!) message protocol. For a look at how this can play out, check out what these guys did with some NSA money: (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
-- pisymbol <pisymbol@gmail.com> wrote: [SNIP} (...) If I'm chosen as the one of the 100, this is what I will work on, using and abusing the BT communications on the NXT. Right now, I'm working at using the RCX Ir-I2C mindsensors.com interface for (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) The language is "MindScript". There's some tutorials here: (URL) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Should I lubricate my Lego motor?
|
|
My robot is having a hard time getting around and I think that it's because the motors seem to be sticking. Even on my linoleum floor, my little tank robot often gets stuck and goes in slow circles, because one motor gets stuck. Once I nudge it or (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Let's not forget about HAL! (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Thanks Steve! I would definitely like to explore this idea if I'm part of the MDP (unless the NXT already has a high-level protocol!). -aps (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) This doesn't sound crazy to me. And, I'd be willing to bet the people at LEGO don't think it's crazy, either. Steve (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) It does. The RIS GUI saves the programs in *.lsc files (in the "Vault"). These programs appear to be a C language variant. The LabView environment does the same thing. TFP (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Well my understaing of JIT compiler is that its a part of the actual runtime so I'm not sure how it would be on the PC?! Though you got me thinking (dangerous), perhaps the best way to program the NXT is not to run a binary but instead use an (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) I don't think you're asking too much. Just be warned that self aware robots tend to be depressed. Just look at Marvin from Hitchhiker's. Oh, and C3PO seems to be bipolar. :-P - Alex (20 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Mammals don't even come like that. LOL! (...) Kev (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) I'd like my NXT to be self aware, straight out of the box. Am I asking too much? :-) Steve (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) I don't know the format of the output of the graphical programming environment. The concept of a JIT compiler seems good to me. Dunno where it should exist. on the NXT or on the PC? (...) Could be. (...) I sure hope so. (...) Kev (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) Because different people want mutually contradictory things. For my own usage, there are times when I want a very procedural language where I can easily specify the precise sequence that things happen in at incredibly fine level of detail (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
|
(...) What is the output of the NXT graphical programming environment? I mean the NXT could already have a JIT type execution environment already whereby the graphical IDE generates pseudo-code ("bytecode") and the firmware on the NXT does the (...) (20 years ago, 23-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
