Subject:
|
Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jan 2006 05:41:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1421 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.robotics, Ted Pawlicki <pawlicki@cs.rochester.edu> wrote:
> > Why couldn't the original RIS language interface have had a button to
> > press which converted your program to a textual form like a
> > conventional language? And this textual language had all the extra
> > goodies that hackers want?
>
> It does. The RIS GUI saves the programs in *.lsc files (in the
> "Vault"). These programs appear to be a C language variant. The
> LabView environment does the same thing.
The language is "MindScript". There's some tutorials here:
http://users.ncable.net.au/~blane/smartParts/04000.htm
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms
|
| (...) And the very best way to use MindScript with LEGO programmable bricks is with Bricx Command Center. It provides context sensitive help, syntax highlighting, code insight, code completion, and a host of other incredibly useful features which (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
4 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Ted Pawlicki) (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Why java is (not) bad for Mindstorms -John Hansen (24-Jan-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|