 | | Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) Well, I did the code changes to do acceleration and deceleration yesterday and it's amazingly successful. I'm not yet quite as good as the Seattle robot, but I suspect that's at least partly because mine has a narrower track. I now believe (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) WOW! That's impressive - but I can't help but get the impression that it's heavily optimised to going around that particular track. Getting that good positioning on the straight sections is impressive - but I wonder how it would have fared in (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) Yes - managing accelleration is a 'must'...both in speeding up and slowing down - and easing into turns. An abrupt change of speed will generally result in wheel slip. (...) It was good in a straight line - but *hopeless* in a turn because the (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) Yes - and it's very fast to implement. Better still, you can use one of several rectangle encoding tricks that are out there (kind of like two-dimensional run-length encoding). Those are typically able to compress at the square of the ratio of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Control a microScout
|
|
(...) Well, the RIS 2.0 tower can drive the microscout - but not the RIS 1.5 tower. The microscout uses something called 'VLL' (Visible Light Link) - which is kinda like the IR commands that you send to your RCX - but they are sent in the visible (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
(...) I meant the error due to things like refraction around solid objects, reflections, etc. Also - I didn't mean estimating and correcting for it at runtime - I just wanted an idea of what sort of magnitude of error those effects presented. (...) (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Navigation using landmarks (Was: Re: lasers and RCX)
|
|
Steve (...) and (...) If it were me, I'd program a PIC chip to do everything and then deliver the results to the RCX. But I'm not a Lego purist. (...) Tradition had it that with three radio beacons and three hyperbolae you'd get three lines (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) needs (...) uncompressing (...) Run-Length-Encoding (RLE) should work well on a blobby black-and-white map. Or you could store line N as the difference (or XOR) between line N and line (N-1). The difference would be mostly zero. Then RLE it. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
<snip> (...) </snip> I hear dogs do a lot of that also... ;) -Rob (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
I've been thinking a bit about using landmarks imitating ants. You should know that ants use different types of self-produced chemicals to mark the places they have been and the paths to follow. Using this with robots would mean using a light sensor (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Control a microScout
|
|
Greetings from Venezuela!!! How can I use a MicroScout as a third motor on my RCX, I own a RIS 1.5 and a DDK or Can I control the MicroScout from the IR Tower? Thanks!! Juan (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) If you haven't already, check out (URL) was able to get quite precise dead-reckoning w/ a Lego bot by programming a PID-type controller. - Gareth (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: control multiple mindstorms robots using 1 IR tower!
|
|
(...) found it! BattleBricks at (URL) the "Remote Control" link under "Support" on the sidebar on the left. (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
Thanks, Just to make sure, let's take an example. Let's say that I have two RCX, named A and B. What if the program in RCX B is waiting for a character on the instruction KEY and RCX A sends a character, let's say '5' (ASCII 52) with 52 EMIT ? That (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | kits on sale - Toronto area
|
|
I was recently at the Cookstown factory outlet (located at highway 400 and 89, north of Toronto) which has a LEGO outlet store. The store currently has Vision Command on sale for $52.99 Can (regular price $149.99) and Exploration Mars $49.99 Can (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) Try this (leJos): import josx.platform.rcx.*; import josx.util.*; import josx.robotics.Navigator; public class Test { public static void main (String[] arg) throws Exception { int size = 100; Navigator nav = new RotationNavigator( ( float)8.5, (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Rover Programming
|
|
(...) While we're talking about programming rovers, could someone give me an example of a 'spiral drive around behavior' in either RCX Code (v1.5) or Gordon's Brick Programmer? Or how about code with two rotation sensors attached to the (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Dead reckoning (was Re: Rover Programming)
|
|
(...) A systematic search pattern is one solution. Not being too anal about it is another - random walking the domain will eventually explore the whole of it, although increasingly inefficiently as time goes on. (...) It's killing me. My first (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: pbForth vs RCX 1.0
|
|
"Mario Beaulieu" <mariobeaulieu@videotron.ca> writes... (...) Yes. I run pbForth on RCX 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0. No differences. (...) No, to my knowledge. In pbForth the IR port is entirely devoted to communication between the brick and the terminal. (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Light Sensor Problem
|
|
Hello, I have been trying out the demo programs in legOS. all demos worked fine except linetrack.c. When I download linetrack.lx in the RCX (RCX2.0) and put it on the test pad that comes with mind storm the bot goes srtaight. It does not recognize (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
