 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
(...) I think they are going a little farther then necessary... I think simple "Report this content" buttons would be fine. Let everyone be a moderator. If the button is pressed the account or picture is held until it is checked. Dean (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) You diddn't read what I just wrote did you? There was no "arbitrariness", it simply was not obvious at first glance that it was on-topic. *Most uploads don't have that problem* because they obviously contain LEGO. I don't think it's fair to me (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Shot by the Sheriff K. Loch
|
|
I don't like the way "Moderation" on Brickshelf is being handled recently. Like probably 98% of all Brickshelf users I never uploaded anything offending, not even unneccessarily large images. Nevertheless, ANY new image I try to upload now is being (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
"Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in news:Gyt8H8.GHr@lugnet.com... (...) [...] (...) You didn't read the thread, did you? The picture is not deleted *ANYMORE*! I had to re-upload an updated version of it! It was then a few times toggled between (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) Yes, it is true. Do you mean the ad in this folder: (URL) doesn't look deleted to me. I don't see any reason why it would be (without complaint from a trademark/copyright holder). In fact, I remember looking at those pictures closely when they (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I like to think of BS as an artist's gallery. Kevin, as the curator of the gallery, displays things for all to see. Why? His motives are his own, but to wager a guess I'd say because he's a Lego Fanatic. Just like the rest of us, and he has (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I just want to say that I'm 100% with Mark! It is fantastic that we all have a beautifull place/site to upload our pictures. And even better, a centralized site where we can see the most interesting creations and ideas from all the AFOLs (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) Have you considered the possibility that people may not have local copies of the images they have uploaded? I would be the first to admit that it is a bad idea to do so, but someone may have accidentally deleted their local copies of some (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Mark" <snowleopard@foxinternet.net> wrote in news:Gys5ED.D7w@lugnet.com (...) Yes, Kevin owns the webspace, but we own the pictures. I think, this is a give and take. The problem is, if people are too frustrated with Brickshelf and turn their back (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Hi Kevin, in news:GyrGGo.3zy@lugnet.com you wrote (...) I don't think it would take a few months to write one short HTML page with your submission rules and put it on www.brickshelf.com. This has nothing to do with programming software. You could (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Hi Kevin, "Kevin Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in news:GyrEEC.MnI@lugnet.com (...) This is simply not true. Read (URL) about my fake ad with the LEGO logo that was deleted from the server. ..oli (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Does this all mean that brickshelf is completely unavailable, I can't even get to the homepage. Tim (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Hello! (...) That seems clear. (...) Well, that seems not to be so clear. How do you define "safe for kids"? OK, no porn. I totally agree. But where begins "porn"? In my opinion this girl licking her ice (out of ABS) does not count as porn. It may (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) Yes, that's quite possible. That's how I do all my Lugnet pages: (URL) the pictures on the pages linked from there are hosted by Brickshelf. thanks, James (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
You know, I really didn't want to post to this thread but, I just rememered a comic strip, "Zits." Do you read it? It's ocassionally funny, but there was a series about a week ago where the main character was all pissed off because his favorite (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) /agree with ++Lar. I mean, what if BrickShelf's HD were to die quite by accident? That has nothing to do with any 'malicious' intent on people's part and yet your photo's would still be gone. Then who do you blame? I have my little web site (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) You should never use ANY place ( your own HD, one particular floppy, BS, some other site) as your one and only place to keep something you consider important. If it's important, keep it in multiple places. That piece of advice has nothing to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
(...) ok, seems to take some time... (...) I do hope that you will let people know beforehand, so they can get their pictures before they are lost. Some of my pictures are at BS only asuming that I trust(ed) that my stuff will not be deleted without (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickmania withdraws from Brickshelf
|
|
Regarding the Brick Testament being under review: In lugnet.publish, Anthony Sava writes: <snip> (...) Well, I'll take a crack at correcting you. Firstly, despite the fact that minifigs do not have genitalia, that does not mean it is not possible to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
