Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Jul 2002 17:48:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2178 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, John Barnes writes:
> I suspect there may be brickshelf regulars who have no interest in posting
> improper material.
>
> Since brickshelf knows who's logged in to upload, why not have trusted
> accounts. New users only become trusted after "n" good moderated uploads. If
> an account is ever complained about, they go from trusted to moderated and
> stay there without being able to earn their trusted status back.
>
> I suspect this may reduce the moderator load a huge amount while maintaining
> the integrity of the site and the immediacy of uploads for people who
> respect it.
I think they are going a little farther then necessary...
I think simple "Report this content" buttons would be fine. Let everyone be
a moderator. If the button is pressed the account or picture is held until
it is checked.
Dean
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) This is an outstanding idea! Kevin, is this easily programmed? At any moment of the day, there are lots of responsible AFOLs checking out Brickshelf. I'm sure nothing bad would remain up for more than a minute. You could make it so that once a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| I suspect there may be brickshelf regulars who have no interest in posting improper material. Since brickshelf knows who's logged in to upload, why not have trusted accounts. New users only become trusted after "n" good moderated uploads. If an (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
