Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:48:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2871 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, Dan Boger writes:
> In lugnet.publish, James Trobaugh wrote:
> > Ok since you hit on the moderation process and the massive backlog,
> > would it be better if we didn't submit and new or updated images to
> > Brickshelf at this time? I had some updated instructions I was going
> > to post, but if it's going to cause someone else's older stuff to get
> > delayed I would hold off.
>
> it doesn't matter if you submit new pictures up - the way the moderation
> cgi works, it shows one of the (random) older folders first... so the
> new folders will just get added to the queue, but probably not get
> moderated until the older folders are done.
Actually, the randomness is only to reduce the change of multiple
moderators working on the same folder. The subset of folders that
are randomized is selected from the newest folders. That way
new stuff and old stuff get moderated.
KL
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
| (...) it doesn't matter if you submit new pictures up - the way the moderation cgi works, it shows one of the (random) older folders first... so the new folders will just get added to the queue, but probably not get moderated until the older folders (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
