Subject:
|
Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 03:33:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2852 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.publish, James Trobaugh wrote:
> Ok since you hit on the moderation process and the massive backlog,
> would it be better if we didn't submit and new or updated images to
> Brickshelf at this time? I had some updated instructions I was going
> to post, but if it's going to cause someone else's older stuff to get
> delayed I would hold off.
it doesn't matter if you submit new pictures up - the way the moderation
cgi works, it shows one of the (random) older folders first... so the
new folders will just get added to the queue, but probably not get
moderated until the older folders are done.
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
| (...) Actually, the randomness is only to reduce the change of multiple moderators working on the same folder. The subset of folders that are randomized is selected from the newest folders. That way new stuff and old stuff get moderated. KL (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
| (...) Ok since you hit on the moderation process and the massive backlog, would it be better if we didn't submit and new or updated images to Brickshelf at this time? I had some updated instructions I was going to post, but if it's going to cause (...) (23 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
