Subject:
|
Re: Redesigning my site...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:47:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
585 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:35:39 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre
Andersen) wrote:
> <!--#include "include/top.incl" -->
How standard is this meta-command? I'll just go try it on my server,
but I'm curious.
Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
| Another approach that is not server dependent is to use a macro processor like Chainsaw. This uses a macro language in your HTML which you expand before uploading. Chainsaw is written by fellow CTPer Bill Burke, of Australia. I've played with it and (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
| (...) It's not really a "meta-command", it's SSI (server side includes). Which is very standard -- part of NCSA HTTPd and Apache, and most commercial servers (not sure about Microsoft's). But the real question is: has your web admin enabled it? (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
| (...) Ups. Syntax error. It should be <!--#include virtual="include/top.incl" --> (...) It is built into Apache (which is running half of the world's web servers), so it's likely it's there. The problem is that your system administrator may have (...) (26 years ago, 12-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Redesigning my site...
|
| Bram Lambrecht (braml@juno.com) wrote: [ about frames ] (...) The main problem is that I can't refer to a specific "page" unless I break your frams. (...) You're right that you have to repeat some information if you use whole pages instead of (...) (26 years ago, 11-Jan-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
34 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
