Subject:
|
Re: Different fonts in webpages
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 12:52:08 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.SPAMCAKEorg
|
Viewed:
|
627 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
> I went through a whole bunch of fonts, and the Papyrus font looked really
> cool, and I didn't even stop to think if others could see it. Eventually,
> I'll have to redo the page... that'll be fun!
There's nuthin' wrong with specifying the Papyrus font, in case someone does
have it installed. I'd also specify something more generic ("serif",
"sans-serif", "cursive") in addition, so you're sure what the fallback will
be.
Both Netscape and IE contain some sort of on-the-fly-downloadable-font
technology, but I've never once seen anyone use it.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Different fonts in webpages
|
| John Matthews wrote in message ... (...) Thanks, John, I went through a whole bunch of fonts, and the Papyrus font looked really cool, and I didn't even stop to think if others could see it. Eventually, I'll have to redo the page... that'll be fun! (...) (25 years ago, 28-Oct-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
19 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
