To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 9883
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) (snip lots of ranting and raving about people ranting and raving) (...) You're absolutely right, Calum. I feel so ashamed for being a shrewd consumer and actually expecting a company that I do several hundred dollars worth of business with (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) I was just looking out the window, and I noticed there are only two shades of grey in the world. It's really odd that the building that's been standing there for 20 years is exactly the same shade as the one they built last week. hmm. (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) What I disagree with is the expectation that you believe you deserve something out of this transaction or that you are the target consumer. I encourage you to stop buying Lego and put your money where your mouth is. If you don't like it, (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) Sarcasm, thy name is Chris... (...) a) it's rtlToronto, a local sub group that specifically caters to the greater toronto and Southern Ontario area, in which we're all friends and hang out and shoot the breeze and have the 'worlds best robot (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) Just trying to fit in. (...) I know it's a local group, but what wows me is that the average rtlToronto-er doesn't seem to grasp that the list gets cross-posted to LUGNET for all to see. It's not like we all go out of our way to follow what's (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) You don't have to hear us if you don't want to. Just add: -.org.ca.rtltoronto to your skip-filter settings (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
<lots of snippage> (...) Relax...take a breath...and your going about it the wrong way trying to fit in. The vast majority of us...well at least Dave and I have read all about the "current" state of LEGO (color change and all). I have to agree with (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
Did Derek just say something? I must've applied a filter or something.... /ignore Derek :) Love it when a plan comes together Dave K -old adage--no one beats up my kid brother but me (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Phillips wrote: (snip) (...) wait a minute, so you're saying that your voice is more important than anyone else's? I will have to differ with that! I see rtl's use of LUGNET to chat as a good use of the medium. And (...) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(snip) (...) ....and trying to tell rtlToronto that its opinions don't mean nothing. Ben (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) Oooh.. let me try! rtlToronto, your opinions don't mean nothing! (undo ALL the negatives in the above to see what I really think) (21 years ago, 25-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) Where did I say that? What I was trying to say is that it's one thing for you guys to bash each other because you know each other and it's all in good fun. It's a somewhat different thing to use strong phrases like "who the hell are these (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) My message isn't so much about rtlToronto (we're just having fun most of the time) as the litany of traffic I've seen. I chose those words and I meant them: I'm not joking about it. (Unlike most of my conversations with Chris) I do think this (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) I nominate Chris to the board of Lego Directors--then let's see how well he can run the Lego company. If selected, all of Lugnet should have his personal e-mail if such position is offered--so we, as the premier fan community, and all-knowing (...) (21 years ago, 26-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Scott Lyttle wrote: (snip) (...) Well worded! Now I know who to read:) (As if I didn't know before) Joe Meno (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
Calum...Next time I see you, be prepared to be ridiculed mercilessly by me...for creating this BIG stinking mess. What were you thinking?? (and don’t answer me...there is no possible satisfactory answer!) Bruce (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 
  Re: Infuriating
 
(...) LOL and there's still plenty of people complaining that technic bricks dont have studs any more. And probably a few stopped buying technic because of it. I don't see any technic sets going back to studded beams yet.... But guess what? The (...) (21 years ago, 30-Nov-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR