Subject:
|
Re: What's Next... Re: Sorry I missed it
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:05:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
601 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 09:01:43PM +0000, David Koudys wrote:
> We would also have to have some sort of ruling on 'bots that don't
> transfer blocks properly--I mean, I could build a 'bot that receives
> blocks rather nicely, but have a built in 50 percent 'faiure rate'
> for delivering blocks--that'd almost be hassenplug!
Or, just have the score be a combination of how many colors you
collected, AND how many other bots have a brick of your color.
--
Dan Boger
dan@peeron.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: What's Next... Re: Sorry I missed it
|
| (...) WAIT.... lets make the score ONLY count if you actually PRESS one of your blocks WITH your mates BLOCKS. this way you have to decide if you WANT to share, OR keep YOUR block..... oh man..... WAIT.... we can comeup with some kind of "ID" AND if (...) (19 years ago, 13-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: What's Next... Re: Sorry I missed it
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) We would also have to have some sort of ruling on 'bots that don't transfer blocks properly--I mean, I could build a 'bot that receives blocks rather nicely, but have a built in 50 (...) (19 years ago, 13-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
