Subject:
|
Re: What's Next... Re: Sorry I missed it
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:07:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
568 times
|
| |
|
|
David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > 'bots would have to have some sort of conformity to send and receive blocks,
> > like the blocks have to be released at 'x' blocks high from the floor. There
> > would, I'd imagine, have to be a standard 'docking setup' like the moonbases, so
> > the 'bots could 'mate' properly to exchange blocks.
> >
> > hmmm...
> >
> > kinda interesting...
> >
> > Dave K
>
>
> We would also have to have some sort of ruling on 'bots that don't transfer
> blocks properly--I mean, I could build a 'bot that receives blocks rather
> nicely, but have a built in 50 percent 'faiure rate' for delivering
> blocks--that'd almost be hassenplug!
>
> Dave K
well we COULD.
or we do like we did with king of the hill. and have qualifying rounds.
so your robot will be shown to work (not in your basement) on the day of
the game to enter.
I am starting to LIKE this idea.
as with ALL rtl events we keep it simple. limit the "protocol" stuff.
so that we dont force a design.
oh my mind is a wandering....
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: What's Next... Re: Sorry I missed it
|
| In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> (...) We would also have to have some sort of ruling on 'bots that don't transfer blocks properly--I mean, I could build a 'bot that receives blocks rather nicely, but have a built in 50 (...) (19 years ago, 13-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
