To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.ca.rtltorontoOpen lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / Canada / rtlToronto / 12182
12181  |  12183
Subject: 
Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
Date: 
Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:04:55 GMT
Viewed: 
2989 times
  
Bruce Sheridan wrote:

> I just manually created a stack of blocks greater than 8 inches tall. If I
> wanted to build a mechanism to deploy that stack, the rules would get in the
> way. So before we even get started, an arbritary limit would have limited a
> possible solution.


If you can't think of a way to get a 8" tall robot to build a tower
taller then 8" the limiting factor is your imagination, not the rules.


> We have never had a problem with bigger robots. Big robots don’t always beat
> smaller robots. 2 RCXs have never had an advantage over 1 RCX. You’ve all seen
> this many times. Why make it a rule now?


The concept of the contest is size.  It's not a rule, its the reason for
the contest.

So far there isn't a rule against multiple RCXs and I certainly don't
want one.


> I don’t want to be constantly measuring the robot to ensure I stay within a
> limit (and then on the day of the contest, we don’t really enforce the limit
> anyway).


When have we ever done this.  Yes we've had size rules at almost every
contest.  I don't recall ever measuring a robot.  If it looks close
enough, it's close enough.


> Block stacking is challenging all by itself.  Plus, you added sorting based on
> your starting color. Now I’m sure it could be done using 1 RCX and staying
> within an 8 inch cube. But from my point of view, you would have just taken all
> the fun out of the contest.


I'm looking forward to the challenge of building a block stacking and
sorting robot into a very small package.  I'm excited about it, and I
haven't been excited about building a robot since Connect 4.

Derek



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
 
(...) I'm sure we all could think of ways to accomplish this, but, I have no idea why we'd want to. Since when has this contest been about being small? (...) Thats great, build a small robot. I on the other hand want to simply build a robot. I have (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
 
I just manually created a stack of blocks greater than 8 inches tall. If I wanted to build a mechanism to deploy that stack, the rules would get in the way. So before we even get started, an arbritary limit would have limited a possible solution. We (...) (22 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

37 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR