Subject:
|
Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:11:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
571 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Sheridan wrote:
> I don’t know why we would want a limit on size. All of the robots that have
> impressed me over time have been on the larger size. I’m not that interested in
> cutesy little robots.
Part of the point of this contest is to build under restricted size
conditions.
> RCXs...I thought we decided that long ago...use whatever you want.
I agree with this.
> I want the 8x8 playfield
Not sure what I would prefer. The 4x4 field makes more sense with the
smaller robot size.
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
| (...) I hope Dave will chime up in a minute, because he was also a big proponent of 8" cubed. I can see both points: Like Bruce, I love stuff like this: (URL) featured in the Greg Hyland AFOLs book) (...) But at the same time, I think the 8" cubed (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
| I like the block stacking idea. I don’t know why we would want a limit on size. All of the robots that have impressed me over time have been on the larger size. I’m not that interested in cutesy little robots. RCXs...I thought we decided that long (...) (20 years ago, 24-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
