| |
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > > In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> > >
> > > First things first, I have one program for player 0, and a second program for
> > > player 1. I cannot play both games with the same program. I'm sure you'll
> > > figure out why.
> >
> >
> > So, does that mean (if you were using a robot) you would have to switch RCXs
> > between games, depending on if you went first or second? :)
>
> That is one way to solve it. A second way is to have a total of 3 RCX's. One
> for running the LEGO hardware, and one for each program. You turn off the one
> you don't want to use depending on if you go first or second.
>
> Have you figured out *why* I would do this yet?
yes. I can think of two valid reasons. :)
> > > There is no real need for steps 3 or 5 (steps 4 and 6 provide the same thing),
> > > but if you tell me what value you want me to send I can send it.
> >
> >
> > That's true. But, given the UI that I have set-up in MY RCX, it is required.
> > Just send back the move number.
>
> Ahhhh, so we all have to put useless code in our programs because that is the
> way you did it? I guess since it is your contest, you can do what you want,
> even if it is irrelevent.
right. You don't have to play, if you don't want to. :) :)
Send back the move you just received. Or any random number between 1 and 6.
> > programming my BFB. So, outside LEGO, I've never used either. :)
>
> Well you are in the minority. More stuff we don't need in our code.
Yes. Currently, your code has a +100. Change that to +1
> Chris, am I doing better in my rtlToronto style banter?
You're getting there.
Steve
"You are soooooo clever. I should not have bothered to even ask the
question..... I mean I *am* talking to Steve." -KC
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
| (...) Care to elucidate? (...) Already done. I changed the -200 to 1 also. (...) Ummmmm, you are *not* Chris.... Right? I mean I've never seen the two of you in the same place. Kevin (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: C$ - Code Only
|
| (...) That is one way to solve it. A second way is to have a total of 3 RCX's. One for running the LEGO hardware, and one for each program. You turn off the one you don't want to use depending on if you go first or second. Have you figured out *why* (...) (21 years ago, 5-Feb-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
