To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.geekOpen lugnet.off-topic.geek in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Geek / 632
631  |  633
Subject: 
Re: Lego.com - new look
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek
Date: 
Sun, 17 Oct 1999 17:01:26 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.=Spamcake=org
Viewed: 
130 times
  
[Followup-to lugnet.off-topic.geek]

Alan Bedford <apotomeREMOVE-THIS@execulink.com> wrote:
> I was expecting some contrary comments on my post, but wasn't really
> expecting a debate on semantics.  :)

*grin*

> As far the expression being 'useless' I would have to disagree on that
> point.  A quick string search on Altavista showed more than 10,000 web
> pages that use that expression.  A similar search under the phrase
> "greatest common denominator" revealed less than 200.

Oh, certainly an amazing number of people use it wrongly. But a lot of
people also say that they "could care less", when they mean that they
couldn't.

People don't think about what they're saying; they just want to get the word
"low" in there somewhere. They could say "design for the (unfortunately low)
greatest common denominator", if the want.

For the example of TV: "greatest common denominator" would mean "the highest
quality of content that everybody can understand" (which is obviously pretty
low *sigh*). The "lowest common denominator" would be "is the TV on".

Ok, so in the case of TV, the "lowest" phrase may make sense. *grin*
But with HTML, you want to design for the greatest you can that will look
good and work well for everyone. You _could_ design for the least, but that
would probably be "straight ASCII text".


> This is absolutely true.  And no matter what expression is used to describe
> the principle, it would seem that LEGO has dropped the ball when it comes
> to their website.

Obviously I agree. Probably the same thing could be said of their Town Jr
sets....

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lego.com - new look
 
(...) Matthew Miller <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in article (...) common. (...) <puzzled grin> I was expecting some contrary comments on my post, but wasn't really expecting a debate on semantics. :) Actually the expression "lowest common (...) (27 years ago, 17-Oct-99, to lugnet.general)

30 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR