Subject:
|
Re: New LUGNET server hardware details
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 Feb 2004 21:43:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1257 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> > Hmm, no tape drive or CDRW.
>
> Nope, I hate tape backup (too slow, too small, too expensive, too unreliable)
> and CDR's are too small and too labor intensive.
I agree completely on the utility of tape. Speed, size, cost, and reliability
are always a problem; tape systems seem to always be a generation behind what
disk drives need (and with the relative demand curves, they are not going to
catch up).
Have you considered a portable self-contained large drive? Costco sells a fast
160 GB Maxtor for $200 with a Firewire/USB 2.0 interface. You can consider the
entire drive package as the media. It's built small and relatively rugged. We
are thinking of keeping our family photo collection on one of these drives.
(Easier to grab in the event of fire/flood/earthquake).
-Ted
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: New LUGNET server hardware details
|
| (...) Nope, I hate tape backup (too slow, too small, too expensive, too unreliable) and CDR's are too small and too labor intensive. Of course, the lack of a CDRW drive doesn't preclude physical media backups from being carried out elsewhere. (...) (...) (20 years ago, 29-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
17 Messages in This Thread: ![New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (28-Feb-04 to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.finance, lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.trains, lugnet.technic, lugnet.space, lugnet.castle, lugnet.org, lugnet.announce)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RE: New LUGNET server hardware details -Tamyra Teed (28-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Thomas Garrison (28-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Todd Lehman (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Tim David (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Todd Lehman (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Jan-Albert van Ree (29-Feb-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Tim David (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Kevin Loch (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Ray Sanders (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: New LUGNET server hardware details -Matthew Miller (1-Mar-04 to lugnet.off-topic.geek)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|