 | | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) [snip] Actually, you answered your own issue about the most convenient way to specify set numbers and eliminate false positives: check for "#" followed by two or more digits! This does, admittedly, still expose a false positive (...) (25 years ago, 16-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) "Did I say 'petabytes', IT Person? No, that array has 2 GIGABYTES capacity, see? Oh, a brand-new 2 gig array takes up two racks, because of the cross- threaded, full-duplex, multi-interfaced aggregate daughterboard, which has to be inverse (...) (25 years ago, 13-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Two words: MP3 Server. I'm on my way over, man. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
Only 2? I'm working on about 25TB to 30TB under Intel boxes. Pretty Scary. Tom Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote in message news:slrn82mq6n.75t....utk.edu... (...) Janssen) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Heckfire, we have a drive array that has 2 petabytes of storage capacity on it. We don't actually use that much data, but it's got THE CAPACITY, man! I know the MacOS can address out to 10 exabytes (that's two levels beyond terabytes, 1 (...) (25 years ago, 12-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Yup. We backup approximately 2.5 TB from various servers/systems each month to our main backup server. (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) No, not all factors. But having an ISP that wants to market its service to a population that sees full-color graphics, snazzy websites, etc from the competition expect you to make something similar for them doesn't qualify as being a prick, (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Whattya mean, 10 years. Terabytes is now. Just not on your desktop. Steve (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) Are yopu saying that _all_ factors in a job are klnown to you beforehand? I submit that it's damn hard to know, in advance, whether or not your boss is a prick.. but that aside. (...) I'm sorry, did I sound scoffing? I didn't intend to be. If (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) Well, I like to get paid, so if I can do it, I give the people paying me what they want. If I didn't want to do it, I wouldn't agree to the job in the first place. Playing with Linux and Beos and other stuff for fun is cool, and if some people (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) See, there's your problem. You work for people who think that "professional" equals "snazzy" and "graphics! Ooh, Shiny! Button-click! Click! Click!". Myself, I go for the "Ka-*Click*" style of dealing with those people, at least in my dreams.. (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) Yeah, that works, but for what I'm being paid and considering this is for a CD they'll be sending out to thousands of potential customers, I think something a wee bit more professional and snazzy is called for. :) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) Yeah, I think I took all of 20 minutes for the Workstation test. And if I hadn't forced myself to reread each question twice with my hands off the mouse I probably could have finished it in 10. I'll do TCP/IP after Net Ess, then Proxy to (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Anyone used AutoPlay Menu Studio ?
|
|
(...) COMMAND.COM AUTOEXEC.BAT MENU.BAT CHOICE.COM A.BAT B.BAT C.BAT Q.BAT X.BAT [...] Hey, worked for me... Jasper (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) When Microsoft ends. I'm not sure whether I want that to be soon or in a decade or two... MS has driven hardware development _hard_ over the past 5 years. They've also made computers from a business tool to a home appliance [faster than it (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) You are on the downhill slide now! TCP/IP is a good workout, its the only test that I was anywhere close to using up all of my time on. Mostly due to rechecking my math on subnet addressing. Net essentials and IIS are pretty much slam dunks. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) 3 up, 3 down. Had a work crisis interfere with taking Net Essentials over the last week - going to try to take it next week. So far I've passed Sever, Enterprise, Workstation. Scores don't matter, but I was close to perfect on all of them. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Mini, Micro, Maxi, Macro, Kilo, etc. (was: Re: Pink spaceship)
|
|
(...) Not necessarily. Some harddrives think a kilobyte is 10^3, and a megabyte is 10^6, and a gigabyte is 10^9. Some harddrives think a kilbyte is 2^10, a megabyte is 2^20, and a gigabyte is 10^3 * 2^20. Others think a gigabyte is 2^30. Endless (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Another MCSE test down!
|
|
(...) So, how far are you now? I've had a four book set of the core exams in my collection for a while now, but the whole allergy-to-printing-ink thing sorta put a big damper on that. Here's to hoping that air-tight forced-air-circulation box I'm (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Need info on "#include" tag in HTML
|
|
(...) This is not an HTML tag, but rather an SSI (server side includes) directive. Well, the "<!-- -->" part is the HTML "comment" tag. But the #include part isn't. It goes something like this: <!--#include virtual="myfile.html" --> It seems like an (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
