Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:31:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
450 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:18:44 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve
Bliss) wrote:
> Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an
> ultimately unclear date.
I'd go for 1st of feb '03. But then, my country is pretty strict in
dd/mm/yy.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) Yes, but is it: January 2, 2003 January 3, 2002 February 1, 2003 February 3, 2001 March 1, 2002 March 2, 2001 (ignoring the six dates from a century earlier) Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an ultimately (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
