Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:15:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
576 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 17:53:08 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve
Bliss) wrote:
> Don't you ever say "February 22nd, 1999"? That's m/d/y.
No.
> What about 01/02/03?
Unlikely, most dates that old get '19' prefixed. or "20", as the case
may be.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) Yes, but is it: January 2, 2003 January 3, 2002 February 1, 2003 February 3, 2001 March 1, 2002 March 2, 2001 (ignoring the six dates from a century earlier) Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an ultimately (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) Hey! Don't blame the Americans! I don't remember the complete details (dive into lugnet.robotics for references and/or the complete story), but I think the French came up with the system currently used by Americans. The French used it for (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
