Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Feb 1999 18:18:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
432 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 24 Feb 1999 15:15:40 GMT, jasper@janssen.dynip.com (Jasper
Janssen) wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 1999 17:53:08 GMT, blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve
> Bliss) wrote:
>
> > Don't you ever say "February 22nd, 1999"? That's m/d/y.
>
> No.
>
> > What about 01/02/03?
>
> Unlikely, most dates that old get '19' prefixed. or "20", as the case
> may be.
Yes, but is it:
January 2, 2003
January 3, 2002
February 1, 2003
February 3, 2001
March 1, 2002
March 2, 2001
(ignoring the six dates from a century earlier)
Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an
ultimately unclear date.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
25 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
