Subject:
|
Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:20:28 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
489 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 25 Feb 1999 17:02:49 GMT, Sproaticus <jsproat@geocities.com> wrote:
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> > Terry K wrote:
> > > I rarely see anyone using _that_ reference.
> > > Nothing like a good, vague reference. <g>
> > In what way was that vague? :-) _Moat_ is their finest work. Even the
> > sequel is good.
>
> It's probably vague in the sense of the ignorant and unforgiving way they
> handled my religion... :-P
>
> Still a good read, though. Although _Legacy of Heorot_ was better, IMO.
>
> Cheers,
> - jsproat
That was a good one. That had a sequel as well, if I am not mistaken. And
there was another book dealing with a different planetary system but I don't
recall the exact name. "Destiny Road", maybe?. Not as good, at any rate.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat
|
| (...) _Beowulf's Children_? Almost as good, but still just a sequel. I've been waiting for _Destiny Road_ for too long now. Ditto for _Ringoworld Throne_ or whatever. I've decided to stop following sequels, and go for fresh meat again. :-, One book (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat
|
| (...) It's probably vague in the sense of the ignorant and unforgiving way they handled my religion... :-P Still a good read, though. Although _Legacy of Heorot_ was better, IMO. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
