Subject:
|
Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 04:23:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
764 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Jeremy H. Sproat writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Shiri Dori writes:
> > I will never give in. I will compose '-less posts. I will!!! ;-)
>
> ure he hall.
Indeed I will. Your posts are meeningless without s's; unlike mine, which will
live on forever.
> huck, eentially eventy-ix perent (orry, that's "percent") of hiri'
> yllable utain aid a'. ertainly (orry, hould ay "with certaintie")
> proat' ranomed letter are most carce inide hi meage.
Truly, I'm not sure one could percieve something from the post shown here. I
could not do so myself, & I'm the very one who smuggled the s's out!!
> o how' omeone uppoed to acertain hiri's meage' uceptability to aid
> "a-ectomies"?
Guess, Jeremy. I did not let one of those horrid "first letters" enter my
posts, where you freely supplied s's for my purpose.
(Even if I needed to look up ecotomies.)
> he aumes, an ouci, boating of uch imperviounee hall
> afely ecure aid letter;
I'll bote with surprising skill, believe me, (I steered lots of ships in my
time!) & will never 'ssist your letters.
> till, everyone' judgement hould prognoticate
> whoe defene i mot ucceful: Shiri's or Jeremy'.
I suppose it would be to my side. I didn't use thes'ureses! ;-)
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
| (...) Sure she shall. Shucks, essentially seventy-six persent (sorry, that's "percents") of Shiri's syllables sustain said a's. Sertainly (sorry, should say "with certainties") Sproat's ransomed letters are most scarce inside his messages. So how's (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
