Subject:
|
Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:03:03 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
jsproat@=SayNoToSpam=io.com
|
Viewed:
|
558 times
|
| |
|
|
Jamie Obrien wrote:
> <goto's get discriminated against way to often!>
10 PRINT "GOTO'S SUCK!"
20 GOTO 10
30 REM :-D
Cheers,
- jsproat
--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Uh, two. Including this one.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
| (...) 10 REM Why GOTO is a bad idea 11 REM you find code like this... 30 FOR N = 1 TO 3 40 GOTO 100*N 50 NEXT N 55 END 60 REM Oh, so smart he cut himself 100 ? "One" 110 GOTO 50 200 ? "TWO" 210 GOTO 50 300 ? "Three" 310 GOTO 50 999 REM Best DaveG (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
