To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.funOpen lugnet.off-topic.fun in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Fun / 5524
5523  |  5525
Subject: 
Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:03:03 GMT
Reply-To: 
JSPROAT@IO.COMnospam
Viewed: 
606 times
  
Jamie Obrien wrote:
<goto's get discriminated against way to often!>

10 PRINT "GOTO'S SUCK!"
20 GOTO 10
30 REM :-D

Cheers,
- jsproat

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Uh, two.  Including this one.



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
 
(...) 10 PRINT "HEY, THAT APOSTROPHE ISN'T SUPPOSED TO BE THERE!" 20 GOTO 10 30 REM :-) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
 
(...) 10 REM Why GOTO is a bad idea 11 REM you find code like this... 30 FOR N = 1 TO 3 40 GOTO 100*N 50 NEXT N 55 END 60 REM Oh, so smart he cut himself 100 ? "One" 110 GOTO 50 200 ? "TWO" 210 GOTO 50 300 ? "Three" 310 GOTO 50 999 REM Best DaveG (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
  Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
 
(...) Is GOTO alright if it's spelled HREF? Steve (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)

Message is in Reply To:
  (canceled)
 

48 Messages in This Thread:

















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR