Subject:
|
Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jul 2000 00:07:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
710 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Shiri Dori writes:
> I will never give in. I will compose '-less posts. I will!!! ;-)
Sure she shall.
Shucks, essentially seventy-six persent (sorry, that's "percents") of Shiri's
syllables sustain said a's. Sertainly (sorry, should say "with certainties")
Sproat's ransomed letters are most scarce inside his messages.
So how's someone supposed to ascertain Shiri's messages' susceptability to said
"a-ectomies"? She assumes, sans souci, boasting of such imperviousnesses shall
safely secure said letters; still, everyone's judgements should prognosticate
whose defense is most successful: Shiri's or Jeremy's.
Cheers,
- jsproat
p.s. I just love thesaurus.com! :-,
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Encoding? (was Re: This isn't good enough!
|
| (...) Indeed I will. Your posts are meeningless without s's; unlike mine, which will live on forever. (...) Truly, I'm not sure one could percieve something from the post shown here. I could not do so myself, & I'm the very one who smuggled the s's (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
48 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
