Subject:
|
Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.fun
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:08:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1410 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.fun, Douglas R. Clark wrote:
| |
I also believe that moderating and judging “crappy MOCs” is wrong. How is a
“newbie” supposed to grow and learn if their “crappy mocs” are always being
deleted? To me that is the most offensive part of your rules. My opinion...
I may participate in your discussions but I probably will never post a MOC
there. I create to please myself not you or your forum.
|
I totally agree. Frankly, if I’m going to be missing out on a MOC announcement
because a moderator was presumptuous enough to delete it, then I’ll be sticking
to the forum where that doesn’t happen. If this is a misunderstanding of the
CSF guidelines then somebody please clear this up for me.
And what is all this hullabaloo about there being a “hullabaloo”, anyway?
lugnet.space is the most peaceful forum I’ve visited. Other science/software
forums I frequent have swanky BB code and teams of moderators, and they still
have fights and arguments left, right and centre... if you think that moderation
is going to solve anything, then good luck and do your best, and I hope you get
some building done... *shrug*
Cheers,
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Announcing Classic-Space Forums
|
| (...) There was really nothing to refute. I was merely expressing my OPINIONS about your guidelines. I was asking an honest question about rule #5 though. What does it mean and was it meant to be sarcastic. I have no problem following a set of rules (...) (20 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
