Results 1201 – 1220 of 1868.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) You'll have to quote me some source for that sequence of events - it sounds like the Official Saddam Version. And yes, even if that's the real undisputed sequence (which I'll bluntly say that I doubt), he'd still do it in a heartbeat. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
bruce
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: To change the tune...
|
| (...) That still only takes up back to the he's an incompetent or liar question, and saying the answer is incompetent still means he shouldn't be president. (...) What terrorists were going to destablize his neighbors? They would have gone for Iraq (...) (21 years ago, 11-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.152)
|
|
| | Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
| (...) I should probably clarify this statement. I'm not saying that I know how much programming or effort it will take Todd to do this, and I realize that his time pretty much equals money here. I'm making a half-assumption here based on what we (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 1.150)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 1.150)
|
|
| |
|
half
(score: 1.150)
|
|
| | What Egyptians think of us....
|
| A recent disccussion from my English Teacher's old professor on visiting Egypt... Upon meeting the college-level students at Cario U. he asked them what they thought of the U.S.A... they fuilled the whole 10' by 5' board. He asked if they could (...) (24 years ago, 19-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
half
(score: 1.150)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.148)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Well, I suppose since I'm not interested in marrying a man, I'll let this one pass for arguments sake to get onto the juicer bits below... (...) Wooohooo! But then, this isn't any different from a standard politician's template - they just (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.148)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Which doesn't mean a thing if they are in violation of the constition. That's the whole point in doing this kind of thing - to test the law. Gotta admire their courage. (...) What a frivilous and idiotic misuse of the amendment process - just (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.148)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Yet. Courage is standing up for something you believe in the face of the consequences - that the other side has turned out too gutless to do anything about it doesn't change that. I (...) Let me introduce you to my counter-argument: Winchester (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.148)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I didn't say that I thought they were right, or wrong, just that I was amazed at your example. (...) Freudian equivalent of a banana peel? (...) So, within the universe of the Bible, Luke, Matthew, John, and Mark are sufficiently separate (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Ummmmmm, where are you going with this? You ironically note that quoting yourself as a source is dubious by itself, but with Todd, Tim, and Jake providing corroborating evidence, you are at least more credible. But in the next breath you (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) Er-hem. I know what you are trying to get at, I'm just trying to point out that your examples aren't exactly the best for doing that (and mostly just to give you are hard time for humor's sake). In your example above, all that's true, but it's (...) (21 years ago, 12-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate freedom
|
| (...) You have summed up the problem without realizing it, I think. If, for example, an administration wanted to quiet someone, all they have to do is throw them in the Gulag (I like Richard's appraisal of what it is) and simply refuse to divulge (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate freedom
|
| (...) (rereading what I wrote) Nope, didn't say that. They all (...) Allegedly. Maybe. Maybe not. If they were, two years held without charges? Those in charge are incompetent or evil. Take your pick, we need to get rid of them either way. When I (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: Terrorists hate spelling properly
|
| (...) Who can keep up with British backwardness, I tell ya! :-) (oops) But still worth making fun of! De feet, boss, de feet! (...) Considering how much you ran on about it, I doubt that! :-) (...) See! I was right! (...) Michaelangelo disagrees (...) (21 years ago, 14-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: codifying marriage on biblical principles
|
| (...) I'm saying that your examples are the exact same as the model you are criticizing. You cite three supporting people (from a single source: Lugnet) as an example of a more believable evidence, and I'll I am doing is pointing out that that is (...) (21 years ago, 15-Mar-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| | Re: The partisian trap in California
|
| (...) So Liberals shouldn't criticize his behavior lest they politically incorrectly "judge" the morays of another culture;-) As for the Young Republican meetings-- I doubt he started attending them before his first million earned;-) (...) The (...) (21 years ago, 5-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
|
| |
|
bruce
(score: 1.147)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
