Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 6541 – 6560 of 11764.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) You only perceive it as a slippery slope because you're heavily invested in your particular deity. That's your right, obviously, but that doesn't mean The State can endorse a deity. To an athiest, an agnostic, a humanist, or even to someone (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) Here are a few other gems from (URL) Sen. Kit Bond, R-Missouri, was one of many lawmakers who immediately reacted in anger and shock to the ruling. "Our Founding Fathers must be spinning in their graves. This is the worst kind of political (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: Netiquette Question (was Re: Legal Education? etc. )
(...) Agree with Larry. Netiquette could swing both ways depending on who, when, and what forum. (...) Ok, my take is a very definite "no". My advice is: Don't be offended by anything. Or try not to be. It's a waste of emotion, and being a negative (...) (22 years ago, 1-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: snip (...) Love people who try to get their points across by jumping right to the end of the slippery slope. I don't believe in the 'popular view', as in 'its just a tradition so who cares?' And (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: Capital Ideas
(...) Simply moronic. The government claims all sorts of things. Sometimes they are right, sometimes they are wrong, and sometimes there are some evil people with a hidden agenda. It has nothing to do with "conservative" or "liberal". It has to do (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I'm confused by it. Before we get into why, I want to state clearly that I oppose the practice of reciting the PoA in schools with every ounce of my being -- but not particularly because of the God thing. Such childhood political (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
I cannot believe that this discussion board, Lugnet, has become an place for antidisestablishmenttarians to comment on what is going on in other people's countries, and describe their mental high on an issue that is controversial. We talk about Lego (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) The original intent of lugnet.lego.direct was to serve for polite, swift and to the point discussions with LEGO Direct (or something mostly to that effect). I think that the group has evolved into something completely different by now. It is (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I wouldn't have expected you to want to keep anyone straight...What do you care? Chris FUT lugnet.off-topic.out...ext-quotes (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I continue to recommend to people to read original sources. It is hard to find a ringing endorsement of religion in Jefferson, for example. Certainly the Founding Fathers read religous books and belonged to various denominations, and the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Some more quotes for you: "The government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded upon the Christian Religion." - John Adams "I am no Christian" - Ethan Allen "I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish Church, by the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) * checks head for trepanning *... hey my keys! Joseph (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I'm delighted too for now, but isn't this a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, one of the more liberal bodies? I assume it will be sent up to the U.S. Supreme Court for their decision-- and I bet we won't be so delighted then. BTW (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) Na... at least not until you actually make some "hilarious" threats. (insert rimshot here). :-) You've got "vague" covered though. Jeremy, in one sense everything said here can be viewed as somewhat likely to offend the sensibilities of some (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) Hey, how does this mean I don't like Dave. A lot of times Dave is a very positive and great guy. I can't say I love him, but without him, Lugnet wouldn't be the same. This type of message is sick though, whomever posts it. Hey, I've spoken my (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) It seems to have annoyed Senator Robert Byrd of W. Va... (I saw him on a clip that CNN showed storming around the senate almost at a loss for words in annoyance at "that stupid judge" missing the point of course that it was a panel of 3 judges (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I was always very confused by this when I was at school in the US. My US Government class made a big deal of the 'separation of church and state', yet we (well not me obviously, though I did stand for it) were expected to recite the pledge (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: Troll Alert
(...) debate Richard was referring to you. Your posts seem to fit his definition well, HIS posts on the other hand have not fit that definition at all. However I am not sure I agree with his characterization of you (if that is what was intended by (...) (22 years ago, 30-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) Eh? I think Schuler is a U.S. guy -- this means he is a citizen of the country with this particular controversy. And while we do talk Lego here, this is off-topic.debate, which gives Schuler some latitude. And that last part -- well, you (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

		One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(URL) For the life of me I can't imagine why this never happened before, but I'm delighted by it. Dave! (22 years ago, 26-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.251)

More: Next Page >>