To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16705
16704  |  16706
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:20:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1474 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

snip

I'm sure your concern stems from the popular view that "Under God" is a
not an endorsement of religion at all, but is rather a traditional
invocation.  With that in mind, I'm sure you'd have no trouble if The Pledge
were changed to "One nation, hail Satan, with liberty and justice for all."

Love people who try to get their points across by jumping right to the end
of the slippery slope.
I don't believe in the 'popular view', as in 'its *just* a tradition so who
cares?'  And this has nothing to do with separation of Church and State--I
don't have to go to church to believe there's a god.  Forgetting for a
moment that I believe in God, though for me that's rather impossible, almost
everyone who just read this line knew that when I put the capital G on God,
that I was talking about the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of the
Israelites, the God of Christianity, the God of the American forefathers,
*my* God.  Yes I know you will throw some stats out that some of the
forefathers didn't believe, or whatever.  It doesn't matter.  Yes there is a
separation of *Church* and State, as there should be.  The state is suppose
to support *all* people, not just the ones who happen to go to a specific
church.  That does not mean that we have to separate God from the
people--don't go separating God from the country.

Some Bible thumpers will say the removal of God from the country is the
reason that 'America is going to H-E-double hockey sticks in a handbasket.
I'm not that guy, either.  It's a perposterous claim--one doesn't have to
look much further than the church to realize that we *all* have problems and
issues to sort out and that *no one's* perfect.

Everyone can believe what they, as individuals, want to believe.  So you
don't believe in a creator--seriously, that's your own opinion--stop forcing
that opinion on me.  The society, in general, as the fonding of the
*nation*, the people, however you want to say it, started out as a God
loving country.  So stop trying to rewrite history, stop trying to say that
we have to go to the lowest common denominator that states 'oh we don't want
to offend *anybody* 'cause you're offending *me* when you do that.  You
can't make all the individuals in society happy--it's impossible.  So just
stop it.  Do what's *right*, what's Just, what's good for *the people*.  The
People believe in some god.  So shaddap when you say they don't.

That said, I'm going to sing '..God keep our land, Glorious and Free...'
with a little more emphasis from now on, and I'll fight to keep that line in
there with everything I have.

snip


I agree with Richard--everybody loves me!  Surely you must have read Suz's
message about the new posting group LUGNET.WE-ALL-LOVE-DAVE.

     Dave!

Ah, Dave!, that new NG was for me.  Sorry to burst your bubble like that but
I know that you value truth above all, so just letting you know.

Dave



Message has 5 Replies:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
Well, I won't go around telling you what to do -- but I disagreed strongly with most of that on a personal level. The separation of church and state should mean that everyone's religious beliefs are respected and that there is no official state (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) You only perceive it as a slippery slope because you're heavily invested in your particular deity. That's your right, obviously, but that doesn't mean The State can endorse a deity. To an athiest, an agnostic, a humanist, or even to someone (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes: <snip> (...) you're arguing about the semantics here. Would it be ok with there were state run mosques? a mosque isn't a church, right? I strongly believe that the state should stay away from all (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) Evidentily the Knights of Columbus did. This Catholic organization is the one that led the charge to get the words "under God" appended to the Pledge of Allegiance. The Pledge has existed longer without those words than with them (okay, not by (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote: [snipitty] (...) Unless I'm totally misremembering, a good number of the 'American forefathers' were Deists, not Christians. A Deist's 'god' would definitely not be the Judeo-Christian God. Steve (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) As of the last census, I was born and still live in the US of A, and I vote, work, and pay taxes here, so my discussions of "my" country tend generally to involve the US. In addition, your sesquipedalian label isn't entirely accurate, since I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR