To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16706
16705  |  16707
Subject: 
Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:45:47 GMT
Viewed: 
1541 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
I
simply don't understand how the US Congress can legislate the phrase "Under
God" without it being a literal State-establishment of religion.

Like it or not, our nation was founded by men who believed that the US was a
country of higher purpose-- as it has turned out to be.  To extricate the core
values of those who created the Constitution is to unravel the very fabric of
our being.

This country was *not* founded by a group of Atheists; I would submit that the
founding of such a country wouldn't even be *possible* from such a group
(Russia is a good example).  Fact is, every country will create a "religion"
whether it is based on a belief in a god or not.

I think the Founding Fathers believed, as do I, that the US would be more than
just another nation among nations.  We believe that we are special, that we
have a higher calling and purpose, and indeed it is *because* of that belief
that we have in fact become that.  We are the most powerful nation to have ever
existed, and yet the idea of conquering the world never occurs to us.  Why?
Because we believe are above and beyond that kind of thinking.

And this country did not become great because of "natural resources" or any
external reasons.  It became great because of its citizen's *attitudes*, their
*optimism* for a better life.  This kind of optimism can only be found in one
who believes that they are a part of some higher purpose.

At the core of our greatness lies the belief in one God.  Now, the P of A
merely says "under God"-- it does *not* say whose brand of God; it does not
endorse any *particular* religion or denomination, which is the true purpose
for the separation of Church and State.  There is no mention of separation of
"religion" and state.

The fact that Atheists don't believe in a God is irrelevant.  Nobody is forcing
them to-- that right is guaranteed by the Constitution.

This country is the way it is because it is the way it is-- change it at its
core and you get a different country.

The fact is that most of the great men and women who served this country were
people of faith-- there is simply no denying that and it can't be changed, no
matter how offensive that may be to Atheists.

We are not a religious state, but we were certainly made great by religious
people. Denying *that* is offensive.

-John



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) I continue to recommend to people to read original sources. It is hard to find a ringing endorsement of religion in Jefferson, for example. Certainly the Founding Fathers read religous books and belonged to various denominations, and the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
John: The founding fathers were not religious and they were certainly not christians -- and that's putting it mildly. More anon... (...) I am sure at least some critical members actually were; or if not, they were merely deists[1] -- which is sort (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) You seem to be arguing that there shouldn't be a separation between church and state, the same thing these 'founding father' seemed wary of. (...) Deists come *awfully* darn close, in function if not appearance. (...) I've always called the (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
 
(...) As of the last census, I was born and still live in the US of A, and I vote, work, and pay taxes here, so my discussions of "my" country tend generally to involve the US. In addition, your sesquipedalian label isn't entirely accurate, since I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

395 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR