|
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
 | | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) But that's not quite the point, either. If the State has the right to mandate religion (which it does NOT, despite John's wishes to the contrary), then I have no legal recourse if the State throws me in jail for not bowing at the alter of the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: <snip> in any case you are ONCE AGAIN missing the point. If the State (...) While I agree with you in your point about keeping religion out of state run affairs... I have the freedom to believe what I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) Ok, lets explore this. You say that people tend to want to not want to help, that they would vote to keep the money for themselves, and that only a government can convince them to help others. Well, what is the government made up of? Last I (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) I'm happy with a claim that anything done to the point of the exclusion of *anything else*, doesn't work. Pure democracy does not work, for it's 'mob rule'--the most voices dictate what happens and the underdogs get (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) So stipulated. But the hypothetical loony[1] who lives down the street from me received no such training, but he nonetheless owns a shack full of guns. (...) Oh sure--*now* you clarify... Seriously though, I've never been to clear on why the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (...) OK. But you're a socialist, right? Since belief that a socialist system can actually work is counterfactual, holding such a belief is a kind of religion since it requires faith. (...) Separation of Church and State. A permanent mural (contrast (...) (22 years ago, 12-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Those stupid liberal judges are at it again!
|
| (URL) this the same 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals that recently ruled unconstitutional the phrase "under God" in the Congressionally-endorsed Pledge of Allegiance? Are Senators Byrd and Lott and Daschle and all the rest going to bitch about how (...) (22 years ago, 10-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Durned Telemarketers!
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney writes: <snip> (...) Agreed on all points, but I'll take whatever I can get to begin with. I can only hope that political and non-profit phone solicitations will be brought under the same restrictions at a (...) (22 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Brickshelf censorship policy rules.....
|
| (...) [Big-Snip] (...) The modern educational system has a hundred years of programming to produce people who, like machine parts, are relatively interchangeable. One of the worst things that a school-based authority can have to deal with is a puple (...) (22 years ago, 8-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Criminal Justice
|
| (...) Loss of that person's company; the loss of the relationship with that person. (...) Well, I'm not sure that a child does either -- certainly not all of it. But there could be other claimants, like a spouse. I think earlier in the thread we (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Cyber Kids 2002
|
| (...) There are two issues that I see, that can be phrased as two questions: Under what circumstances does a parent/guardian have the right to subject their children to surgery (even if minor outpatient)? Is it a good idea to participate in a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Mass Extinctions
|
| Curt wrote: > That's frightening. > I have a question to any biologists out there. Is it possible to store the > DNA of males and females of each species, so that if the species goes > extinct, it can be revived? Of course, there is the question of (...) (22 years ago, 4-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Criminal Justice
|
| (...) lens... I've been thinking about this for quite a while and I think that either I misunderstand your meaning, or you're wrong. The notion of equality under law, I think, is somewhat slippery. Further, it seems some times (this included) that (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.258)
|
|
| | Re: Criminal Justice
|
| (...) Setting aside the loss of income issue (because I'm still not sure and don't have anything insightful to say), what does "loss of society" mean? (...) Let's imagine that a kid is part of a rich family until he's ten (way old enough to have (...) (22 years ago, 3-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.257)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.257)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.257)
|
