|
 | | Re: Carthage
|
| (...) Who knows? But there are not too many identifiable folk who have not assimilated. That nobody really understands precisely what a helot was, is one demonstration. I know of a story of one annihilated city whose survivors petitioned their (...) (22 years ago, 27-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) If anything, the true beauty of The Brick Testament (aside from the incredible modelling and stunning photography) is that it avoids controversy almost completely by simply telling the stories of the Bible without actually changing them. Who (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) First, what does it matter which skyscraper was levelled? If it was Bloor and Yonge that was 'ground zero' and a year+ later JC was going on some campaign against someone who wasn't even *involved* in the attack, of course we'd call his (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I am saying that I care *more* *because* it happened to me, as you would if OBL had leveled Buckingham Palace and 1,000s of *your* countrymen were murdered. You just don't get it. If not for the courageous actions of a handful of Americans, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) And I wonder how we would all feel if Dubya at least acted like a true leader of "the people"--leading them to do the right thing--instead of trotting down the same old 'naive solution' of 'he who has the biggest stick'. What I want to hear, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Carthage
|
| (...) One could compare it to a much more present situation :-) (funny how History repeats itself over and over again) (...) Are you sure that so many wars ended that way? From my own experience, I think it's a lot more common that the "losers" of (...) (22 years ago, 26-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.266)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) Well, here's a brief interesting historical interpretation: (URL) entire article (the good bit is closer to the end of the article, listing a bunch of, shall we say, more colourful metaphors used by American and Canadian folks): Editorial: (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) I prefer Mike Huben's analysis: "The Libertarian Party is well on its way to dominating the political landscape, judging from its power base of 100+ elected dogcatchers and other important officials after 25 years of effort." ;) More here: (...) (22 years ago, 25-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Habeas Corpus? Never heard of it...
|
| (URL) bother with silly old due process... just lock them away for months or years and we'll all be a lot safer. "them" in this context being whoever it is the government has squirreled away for our protection. Not sure who exactly that *is* since (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: Not embarassed to be a Canadian anymore...
|
| (...) I think you have it backwards, Dave! None of the above would claim to be unbiased-- they are honest and open about their conservative leanings. It's the print media, the networks, public radio who disingenuously pass themselves off as "fair (...) (22 years ago, 24-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) It's not. But we're performing a useful service to the country nonetheless. A filibuster proof Senate with the likes of Bob Barr running some things is a scary thought to behold. (...) c /libertarian Republicans/Libertarians/ and you're on to (...) (22 years ago, 23-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
| (...) I think I know who you mean and he certainly wasn't hired by ME, not even a little bit. Nor was his dad, for that matter. (...) Ashcroft? Not sure who you mean, as there are so MANY candidates, unfortunately, that fit the description. (...) I (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: How not to get fired...
|
| (...) fired (compared to how for profit businesses where employee performance presumably matters) is not the same thing as suggesting that there ought to be a quota(1) on how many people get fired a year in government. The point is that US (...) (22 years ago, 21-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
|
| | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid
|
| (...) Not hard at all--science. More specifics--space program, aeronautics, other stuff--yes the world benefitted from these things but specifically, the US--letting in German scientists and turning a blind eye to some atrocities during the war they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.265)
|
