Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 5521 – 5540 of about 12000.

Search took 0.03 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Yeah I think we can all agree on that. -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) You're stripping away the numbers for the sake of a punchline. According to the first article, the number of firearms-related murders in 1996 England/Wales was 49. Forty-nine! Pittsburgh alone had 47 murders in 1996, and we don't have a gun (...) (22 years ago, 3-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Freedom from information
(...) A good writer of fiction and propaganda, yes. And to be fair, that's all he claims to be. When pressed, he doesn't claim to tell truth. My issue with him is that he doesn't disclaim very well at all and the credulous are (perhaps deservedly (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes: <snipped the stuff I mostly agree with> (...) Why is it hard to fault Rather? I'm a bit lost on that part. I don't think it's hard at all! Is it hard because he's developmentally disadvantaged or (...) (22 years ago, 27-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Refutation--the camera itself didn't cause the accident--the camera didn't change the timing of the lights. Saying something like there's causality between the camera and the accidents is like saying thre's causality between people waking up (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) The MASH movie, as intended by the director, wasn't suppose to mention that it took place in Korea at all to 'blur' the line between thinking it was about Korea or about Vietnam. Another interesting tid-bit about the movie was that there was (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: MASH (Again...) Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Radar talking over anyone and getting things done... You're right--very cool. I had a wee sniffle when Radar left the show, with the salute and all. Notable highlights in my mind regarding Radar... When Margaret thought she was pregnant and (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) So you want the state to protect you from yourself and your weak will then? Is that it? I'm going to campaign to outlaw hot fudge, after all, some people can't resist it. (...) It might be what you're advocating, it just doesn't happen to be (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Not that I haven't talked about my favourite 'Classic Rock' radio station all day today... But at 7:55 a.m. (usually on my way in to work) they have "'The Last Word' with Maureen Holliway" She gets on there and basically talks entertainment (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Not in my name!
(...) I wondered about that as well--whom do you "throw your hat in the ring with" when it comes to these amss protestors? When I was hanging out with my 100,000+ friends in Toronto a few weeks back, doing the march for anti-war, I looked around and (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Hit fudge hasn't killed anybody, that I recall-I could be wrong. Ask a father what he wants done to the criminal who had just raped and killed his daughter. Weak willed? I don't think so--I'm just glad that laws are supposedly made by rational (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: And now for something completely different...
(...) I think the question is, would you want everyone ELSE to know? I don't think there are many people who wouldn't want to know, but think how many people would loot, riot, quit their jobs, etc, etc, all without fear of reprecussion. Our last (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: And now for something completely different...
(...) well, look at it from a resources point of view. a colony in space or on another planet would cost trillions, and yet people are starving to death here on earth. What can a space colony do that would make such an expediture worthwhile? I'm (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) True, but both articles site that illegally owned firearms were/are responsible for the vast majority of crime. The first article states that tighter gun control will not have any positive impact (but probably have a negative one) on the crime (...) (22 years ago, 1-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) My biggest beef with MASH is that it was rather blatant in its bias, and worse, it was good enough that it made Alan Alda and Mike Farrell (useful idiots both) and other fellow travelers shedfuls of cash. But it's a pretty funny show (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		And now for something completely different...
(URL) you want to know if a giant 'planet killer' asteroid was heading straight for earth? Tough question for me. If I knew, I'd probably quit my job and spend my last few days with those I love and doing my own thing. That is, if there was no hope (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Please give up on the notion that gun supply can somehow be controlled. There will always be guns, whether they are stolen from my house or produced in a third world nation. Anyway, the whole issue will become moot when technology gives us (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) That is because the crime rate in Canada and the UK and anywhere else you choose to examine has gone up (NOT down) after Gun Control policies were enacted. It is impossible to reduce the number of guns that criminals will get so long as guns (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) But I think the point that was made to you in response to that assertion is that it is a canard-- it will never happen, and so you really could never prove it anyway. But people have thought along those lines and tried to ban guns anyway. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

		Re: We love our guns!!-- was Re: Dan Rather is a Useful Idiot Extraordinare
(...) Indeed. Now just enforce it. Enforce the laws against robbery, burglary, rape, assault, murder etc, and perhaps there will be less of a problem. But no, the police are apparently way too busy enforcing other laws like when shops can be open (...) (22 years ago, 28-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.275)

More: Next Page >>