Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 4801 – 4820 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Exactly why I called them "pro-gun wacko" sites. However I still can not find any "anit-gun wacko" sites to refute them. Somewhere in the middle lies the truth. (...) No it isn't, I simply made the mistake of assuming we all knew that as long (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) That is pretty much what I just said. (...) Well the Israelis are using tanks and helicopters. (...) No, the constitution allows the government to call on the people when neccessary. (...) So? (...) Nukes are overrated. One of those defense (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Here's one web reference that might be familiar to you: (URL) in that post I link to a site that specifically addresses the Australia problem. In particular, your citations (which in essence simply parrot the same statistics and might as well (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: How to start a fire.
(...) Probably a bad idea. By calling into question the definition of innocence, life, experience, and sentience, you're allowing an "in" that's off-topic. Fetuses are killed by civilian mothers and civilian doctors. The Iraqis in question were (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
(...) Look, before the war there wasn't ANYBODY who doubted that SH had WMD. It was a given; period. There is documented proof that he used them on the Kurds and killed them by the 100,000s for crying out loud! So all of this "where are the WMD" is (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Revisionists...
(...) There's an infinity of difference between lying about Oval Office Oral and the creation of a war and lying about the basis of that war. Frankly, I think it's sickening that you can't see a difference. On the one hand, a manipulative woman got (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) No it doesn't. Take Austraila for example. Here are some "pro-gun wacko" sites with statistics (URL) enough I can not find any "anit-gun wacko" sites with contradictiong claims. (...) Do you think we can succesfully invade every country with a (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I agree entirely. That's why I never get into the statistics of it with people. The point is: gun control would only control the law abiding. Criminals are by definition scofflaws, and they don't care about your stinking gun control laws. Who (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Then you need to pick a side to stand on. Are you saying that increased gun control does lead to an increased crimerate, or are you saying that increased gun control is irrelevant to an increased crimerate? If the former, then your statement (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Revisionists...
(URL) senior US senator says he has evidence that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) deliberately withheld crucial information from the UN arms inspectors deployed to Iraq. The claim comes as Congress prepares to open inquiries into whether the (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Newsbits (was Re: Revisionists...)
Nuclear Evidence on Iraq (URL) edit: includes great bits like "What Intelligence Officials Knew about the Forged Iraq Nuclear Evidence," and "The Bush Administration’s Use of the Forged Iraq Nuclear Evidence" The Dog Ate My WMDs (URL) The questions (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) I don't have a chip in my brain telling me I must stop. Ergo, I run my life. Then again, and very conveniently, I don't have a problem with the concepts of Law nor Law making: my perception is that the society I'm part of writes a code of (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
(...) Not much of a memory, have you Mr. Neal? Many here doubted the WMD evidence from the first. We all laughed at Colon Powell's poor performance before the U.N. (there are even sources that claim he was angry at the doctored evidence he was (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		More War = More Terrorism, Less Security
Former Aide Takes Aim at War on Terror (URL) Five days before the war began in Iraq, as President Bush prepared to raise the terrorism threat level to orange, a top White House counterterrorism adviser unlocked the steel door to his office, an (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Separation of Church and State
(...) Remember though that all the parents have lower taxes and thus have more money than before to choose an appropriate private school. Also, there would be a greater variety of schools, religious and non-religious (and even a few (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Partly, that it may require periodical updates, which can contradict the previous text; as such, what today is off-limits for the government can become one of its tasks tomorrow, in a perfectly legal fashion. It's not eternal or unchangeable (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) But what was the motivation? All we know is what the Government tells us. (...) So what is your recourse if the Government breaks the law? Besides so long as a single manufacturer of guns exists on the planet, criminals will always have them. (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Does it matter? (If you think so, why?) If all they had were motivation, they'd still be looking after the means to kill. Endlessly, or at least with a high chance they'd never actually "act". (...) I don't know if I can provide an answer to (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Re: Swift was Right! (He just named the wrong people...)
(...) Well, of course he's not--Kim Il Sung, after all, is dead and buried; Bush has not been so accommodating hitherto. (BTW: if I hear another TV newscaster refer to "Kim Jong the Second" I think I shall scream.) best LFB (21 years ago, 14-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.285)

		Mobile Lab Not Proof
Iraqi mobile labs nothing to do with germ warfare, report finds (URL) An official British investigation into two trailers found in northern Iraq has concluded they are not mobile germ warfare labs, as was claimed by Tony Blair and President George (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.285)

More: Next Page >>