Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 381 – 400 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
(...) In what sense? (...) In what sense? (...) He has power, but no athourity. He lost the argument a long time time ago, and ever since has relied on "might-makes-right". MLK Jr: "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided (...) (21 years ago, 8-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.879)

		Ron Paul: idiot then, idiot now
<https://www.newswee...1584916232 Read here.> At a time when all non-idiots worldwide are taking action to limit the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, a certain chorus of career idiots happily spreads false information to create the idiot illusion (...) (5 years ago, 23-Mar-20, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.877)

		Jefferson on Copyright and Patent
Thomas Jefferson to Isaac McPherson 13 Aug. 1813Writings 13:333--35 (URL) It has been pretended by some, (and in England especially,) that inventors have a natural and exclusive right to their inventions, and not merely for their own lives, but (...) (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, property
(score: 0.873)

		Re: And now for some fluff after all the heavy conversations...
(...) It's just SO wrong to use Blacktrons against me... I declare this space the property of... (URL) ::munching Freedom Fries dripping in good ol' 'meriKKKan ketchup, just in case those federal eyes are watching:: -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, property
(score: 0.871)

		Well....
Because I recently got into an extremely brief discussion with a good friend on Twitter (Hi Lar++), I've paused to consider my 'beliefs' (for lack of a better term). Starting here, oh so many years ago, I've had to re-evaluate my conceptions and (...) (5 years ago, 9-Jan-20, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.870)

		Re: The 1st....
(...) Seems pretty cut and dried to me. What rights did the posters purchase from the owner of the publishing venue (the owner of the privately owned BB)? Assuming the owner is in the US that's all that matters, posters nationality is irrelevant. (...) (21 years ago, 29-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 0.870)

		Re: Detroit's woes, unaddressed by the Dems
(...) Yes, of course they do. And that's not always a bad thing except when it gets kinda rabidly slanted a particular way. I try to post stuff that is at least semi-objective from a huge variety of sources. Sure, some of it is just (...) (21 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.869)

		Re: Art? or Theft? or just signs that NPR is damaged.
(...) In general, or at specific naff implementations? (...) I'm not sure quite how far back to go to answer this. Do you deny that it's even possible for a private firm to do something more efficiently than a government? If you do, we have no basis (...) (21 years ago, 13-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, property
(score: 0.867)

		Re: And now for some fluff after all the heavy conversations...
(...) What?! Yeah thats not a violation of his constitutional rights or anything. (...) Agreed. (...) Ok that picture was just messed up. This calls for... -General Insanity (URL) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.867)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) I agree if there were laws or even constitutional rights that caused the deaths of innocent life I would be all for removing them too. Of course removing the right of law abiding citizens to have weapons does not reduce the crime rate, even (...) (21 years ago, 23-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.867)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) And we discussed this before--and you added addendums to the idea of "whole people" to not include those that are too young, old, infirm, or mentally unstable. Did you also stop to consider that, in context of the day and age, that "whole (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Re: More on Airport security.
(...) Larry, this is a stark example of how your Libertarianism takes ideas out of context. You have some idea that rights and risks adhere to individuals. But that is no longer the essential principle in our present context. Rights have already (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) Not at all. You would be 100% correct as to the meaning at the time of ratification. But collectively, the 13th and 14th Amendment gave freed slaves the status of Freemen. Knowing precisely what that meant, many freed slaves had to obtain guns (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Gotta love Oracle...
(...) Yup. And some kind of licensing and proof of insurance will probably be part of that security. Incidentally, were I to be a road owner, one thing I would insist on is that drivers be insured in addition to vehicles. The vehicle isn't (usually) (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Gotta love Oracle...
(...) Arguably, no. Not on a rights based calculus. But see Friedman (1) who argues that rights based calculus breaks down at the edges (asserting your right not to ingest one molecule of extra CO2 due to a car near but not on your property is a bit (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) You didn't say anything new in there at all, Mike. Lets have a looksee-- " Are you joking? “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” What (...) (21 years ago, 21-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) Did you even read that cite again? Read the whole 3 message thread please: **From Bouvier's Law Dictionary and Concise Encyclopedia: POSSE COMITATUS. These Latin words signify the power of the county. Or yet again in other words: the power of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) It hasn't been amply settled. You are not a well regulated militia by any standard of those words. It's a point you consitently avoid--you and others cut right to the "the rights of the people to own guns shall not be infringed" Further, you (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Misleader and the Gay Apocalypse
First just go and see it: (URL) A Band of Brothers: The Rebuilding of Iraq (URL) Recent estimates now put the final figure somewhere between $200 billion to as much as half a trillion dollars over the next ten years. America's Iraq-sticker-shock may (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 0.866)

		Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah)
(...) politically independent news reporting, but it must also be said that the Libertarian party has no serious presence in State College, and, while Heicklen is certainly a bonehead, his methods and views were (when I was at PSU) denounced by many (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights, property
(score: 0.866)

More: Next Page >>