To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 3741 – 3760 of about 12000.
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote: <snip> (...) While que question is not addressed to me, I will try to answer it for myself. Of course, I am Québécois, so I don't have to vote, but here's my answer anyway. Kerry, as I understand it, (...) (20 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Yes. I am curator for all of .off-topic, including .debate However by choice I have not done anything to the sidebar of this group (unlike .fun or .geek) (...) Yes. Send me (or Frank) a list (urls preferred) of any and all posts you want (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Bill O'Lie-ly
 
(URL) article Bill. Let me point out just a few spins from the 'no spin zone'... " Even countries like Canada are no longer dependable allies. According to a Macleans poll, 38% of Canadians say their attitude toward the USA has worsened since 9/11. (...) (20 years ago, 19-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
 
(...) So Fox a free network channel has better ratings than CNN a 'pay for' cable channel. What does that have to do with ABC, NBC, and CBS (all free network channels) all having better ratings than Fox? (...) If you actually belive that, it (...) (20 years ago, 5-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) I wonder if all the other unnecessary civilian deaths in Iraq make ordinary Iraqis feel equally angry? I wonder if the light sentences purportedly being dished out to those involved in the physical abuse, sexual abuse, rape and murder within (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) If you wish to keep on insulting the messenger, all the power to ya. I'm just trying to get a coherent idea of where you're coming from. Stated--the Iraqis have blogs now, they didn't have blogs before the occupation. What'd I miss? So I'm not (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Actually, you *can* win an election on that. But Ok, here goes... + Kerry, by all accounts, served his country with honor and bravery in Viet Nam, even though he could easily have dodged military service the way that Bush and Cheney did. On (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) Don, I've never thought of you this way, so I assume you are being sarcastic? I myself am very passionate about the upcoming election simply because there is so much at stake. I've watched in horror over the past 3.5 years as our government (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.318)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Don Heyse wrote: I hope Dave K. will forgive me for jumping in. Here are a few points worth noting: (...) Does that mean that we can bomb Iraq and slaughter civilians for all time, until we are satisfied that the 15% (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) Well, that guy wearing the hood and standing on the box with wires attached to his genitals probably had more than enough electricity. See? The Dubya/Cheney/Rumsfeld reconstruction agency is improving conditions all the time! Dave! (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) It's the 'Murica that just grates like nails on a blackboard. But who am I to speak? I say "T'ranna" for Toronto. (...) Hey! I'm the hick here! The loud mouthed "Canada da bomb, USA SuxOrs!!" Well, no, not really. But the hick part is mostly (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) I don't actually like him. In fact I cringe whenever I hear him speak. Probably the born again affectations that disturb me. Anyhow, I'm not as smart as you, so I can't really put into words why he's got my vote so far. Probably it's the war (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) Maybe Dave just realised it (again?)... it's easy to lose sight of how bad the bad guys are when what you mostly hear about is how bad the good guys are. Where was the outrage in the media at all the previous atrocities by the various thuggish (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
 
(...) [snip] (...) I think the part about the sinking ship may be just wishful thinking on the part of the democrats, but time will tell. Anyhow, what I'm wondering is what makes you feel this current administration is any more arrogant than the (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) Dogs don't know any better. They didn't 10,000+ years ago, and they won't know any better 10,000+ years from now. Men, on the othe hand, are suppose to have this capacity for change, for conscious reasoning, for saying "Just because I can do (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
 
(...) Nice. (...) Ahh, back to the 'US needs to be in Iraq to curtail terrorism towards the US' card. Please tell me the following, in case my 'thinking processes' as you alluded to, weren't 'on' at the time--How many Iraqis hijacked planes on 9/11 (...) (20 years ago, 12-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Perhaps they shouldn't have dumped stuff, which they didn't know what its effects might be, in an unsecured area. Think about how we handle radioactive waste. Some of it, we don't really know what effect it will have, so be bundle it up to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

property
(score: 0.317)

  Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) VAT in practice, though, is more of a sales tax except that companies don't pay it. What happens is that everybody charges VAT on everything, which is to be transferred through to the government, but companies get any VAT they have paid back. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

property
(score: 0.317)

  Re: The Essay (was Re: The status of Iraq from a soldier who is there.)
 
(...) Its relevant because most printed editorials in my local papers are liberal propaganda. (...) Yup, that is a good source of conservative propaganda. (...) See overall the media is dead center. That is why liberals think it is right wing biased (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

  Re: Wining Hearts & Minds
 
(...) If it's "handled correctly" a lot of people will end up in the slammer: (URL) Against the law of war> "the laws of war require that all countries take the necessary steps to ensure that they are respected. All military personnel should receive (...) (20 years ago, 4-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 

all
(score: 0.317)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR