Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 2821 – 2840 of about 12000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Really? Upon what do you base that observation? Because based on all of my observations, everything known has a beginning and an end (except the existence of the universe). (...) My point was that it is UNscientific to generate a theory by (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.351)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
(...) No. You keep equating rights and needs as the same thing. I'm saying they are not the same thing. Your first line in this sequence is incorrect on my outlook: that's your interpretation of it but that's NOT what I said. (...) don't (...) of (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.351)

		Re: We are what we eat. Or is that "whom we eat?"
(...) See that sentence above? Read it in its entirety. See the word "right"? See the word "need"? See how you place them in the same sentence and attribute them to me? This is your interpretation (i.e. what you THINK is the case). It is not (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 0.351)

		Re: Why is cockfighting bad? (was: Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line))
(...) Good question. I don't have a definitive answer but I do have some further thought starters... In Star Wars, is there a good side and a bad side? Is the simulated violence there as part of the story line? Or is the violence there merely to (...) (24 years ago, 17-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

property
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Well, to expand upon the thoughts of the 'science camp' (which, if we wanna use isms, is Mechanistic Naturalism) - we can use Occam's Razor to cut away every explanation except the most simplistic. There is no supernatural diety, the entire (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) You know, it's a really SIMPLE answer... God is omniscient and omnipotent and created the universe, along with it creating the rules that govern the universe. Science is the human study of the laws of the Universe, those inviolate laws set by (...) (20 years ago, 17-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) First of all, let's address this "Big Band" issue. I don't have much fondness for Lawrence Welk, but I guess Glenn Miller's okay. And Guy Lombardo? Don't get me started... (...) Not so fast! "Outside" is a dangerously tricky word in this (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: Excellent news!
(...) Pretty much zealots like this guy are the reason I've stopped attending Church Proper. And that 'born again' = getting into heaven? Yeah, nice on ya... Idiots all. Dave K (20 years ago, 14-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Leonard Hoffman wrote: <snip> (...) And I would agree with the above--which God and such--all great questions. That said, the main agruement from the 'science camp' is that there can be no God because there is no proof (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Agreed. Which is why I have yet to see any science argue about events before the Big Bang(1). Those questions are best left to philosophers. -Lenny (1)= Well, not entirely true. Stephen Hawking has an interesting idea about the history of the (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) No one said that science was everything to everyone. Literature, for example, is outside the scope of science (for the time being). (...) Ahh.. see if only it were so simple. Is it a God (all powerful, omnipotent) or a god (limited (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.350)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Science doesn't need to answer question for which it doesn't have enough evidence to address. According to the Big Bang Theory, one cannot ask what caused the Big Bang or where the Big Band came from, because (according to the theory), all (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: The True North Strong and... Free?
(...) Well, lift the ban and all h-e-double-hockey-sticks breaks out in Parliament... (URL) there you are Oh Canada! Dave K (20 years ago, 7-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) It sort of bugs me when people who are referring to God not capitalize it in an attempt to somehow disacknowledge His existence, but I digress (and demote "Science" to "science") (...) I like Lenny's statement, but I think there is much (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) It's primarily based on what I know about time considering its relation to energy, and how time is actually unconstant. Also, a sneaking suspicion that time is "curved" just like everything else. Similar to how we once thought the Earth was (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote: <snip> (...) And this may be the crux of my problem with Science. Science categorically denies the existence of anything it cannot investigate. It requires proof, something that is categorically (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) I'm not comfortable with the capital "S," by the way, but I suppose that's a stylistic choice rather than a deification of "Science." But I digress... I think that that's a mischaracterization, though. Regarding something that it can't (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Oops! Did I do that? If so, I didn't mean to--sorry! I usually try to refer to the Christian deity as capital-G "God," but I know that I've sometimes included him in the rhetorical group lower-case-g "gods." I try to use the latter reference (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) I don't think I'd consider it a dodge, really. My own thought on it is that there's no such thing as "first". The concept of time is just a perception you have that appears linear. I happen to think it's more circular in nature, without a real (...) (20 years ago, 11-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all
(score: 0.349)

		Re: We're being attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of culture!
(...) Yggdrasil will finally get the recognition it deserves! I'll love ramming it down the throats of all those Origins-thumping eddicated segments of society. -->Odin All-Father<-- When there's a weekday named after Darwin, you can get back to me! (20 years ago, 1-Apr-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all
(score: 0.349)

More: Next Page >>