|
 | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Yes. When they are necessary. You haven't proven the case that this particular law (banning public nudity) is *necessary* yet, though. If a law isn't protecting the rights of citizens from being infringed, it is not necessary. (not every law (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
|
| (...) In your original statement, you said "hose" when I assume you meant "house". I was just making fun (sorry for being off-topic...) (...) To a pure Libertarian, laws telling you that your store must serve anyone regardless of race (ect), are an (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
| (...) Official what? (...) Ah - *thats* what you mean.. cool, agreed! (...) There's no reason why you couldn't use the existing infrastructure as a scaffolding to create a new one. (...) Except that the federal government can close or open any (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Really? I will have to look that up now. If for no other reason than curiosity. I'm not sure I'm ready to accept that I can only exercise my 2nd ammendment rights within the confines of my own state. (25 years ago, 20-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Gay Marriage
|
| "Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:HzIL24.D99@lugnet.com... (...) they (...) apply to (...) about (...) There is a lot of baggage associated with marriage that should be available to any couple. The problem with (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) Oh, absolutely, but I was giving situation-type examples, and today's racial profiling (of black drivers, of Arab airline passengers, etc.) is of the same species. And regardless of the civil rights movement, it was wrong of the government to (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Sanctions (was: Libertarian Propaganda)
|
| (...) Pardon me, but are you describing me or YOU here?! I think you're a bit confused, you just described several aspects of your on-line self in that paragraph. Get a grip on reality, my friend, and realize that you mostly stir up trouble here and (...) (23 years ago, 15-Jun-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Search for Saddam
|
| (...) Don't be silly, 50 years ago they didn't need a scapegoat to keep you in fear and under the belief that you need the government to protect you by taking away your rights. -Mike Petrucelli (21 years ago, 19-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Those who cast the votes decide nothing.
|
| (...) Let's put some fresh meat on these bones: (URL) Iraqi civilian deaths 'avoidable'> ==+== Human Rights Watch raises some serious questions about the way in which specific weapons were employed. It strongly criticises the use of cluster (...) (21 years ago, 12-Dec-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: A lttile tiny cheer...
|
| (...) Here's something, I've noticed that on this NG that most 'intellectual debaters' are not for the Patriot Act due to the limits on freedom and stomping on the Bill o' Rights... Yet another NG (remain nameless), the Patriot Act is seen as some (...) (21 years ago, 28-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) I think you just said that it's sick because it's sick. Is that really what you meant? (...) I have, over and over -- across the years, claimed that the rights of the majority and the minority must both be set up so that they do not conflict (...) (20 years ago, 10-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep
|
| Sproaticus wrote <37C6B434.B9FCA361@io.com>... <snip> (...) So you are aiming to the "next-best" solution. How bout if your neighbour is aiming to the "next-best" of the "next-best" solution and so on ... ??? So "rights" has to be equal. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: Family values?
|
| (...) And what's much worse in this case is that one poor fellow is being forced to shoulder the responsibility for a child that is not his- and that the same courts give him no rights to see or have a hand in raising. That makes absolutely no sense (...) (24 years ago, 4-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| | Re: National vote on handguns?
|
| (...) I support the process, but reserve the right to bolt if I don't like the outcome... (...) This is my problem with this proposal as well. I think you have to have basic rights that are much harder to revoke than just majority rule. I've said it (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 1.975)
|
