To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10393
10392  |  10394
Subject: 
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 10 May 2001 20:44:25 GMT
Viewed: 
837 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

Attempts to deregulate the medical industries have demonstrated that
lawsuits increase dramatically and costs are passed immediately to the
consumer.  To suggest that the solution is more, not less, litigation is
contrary to available evidence.

I am not aware of any deregulation of the medical industries, at least not
in this country in the last, oh, 70 years or so. Can you elaborate?

Or were you meaning deregulation like what California did in the case of the
power industry. That doesn't count. That was a false deregulation, with less
market forces in operation after than before.

  No, that's not it.  I'll try to track it down for you.  I got it from a
recent debate about the proposed Patient's Bill of Rights.

    D



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) I am not aware of any deregulation of the medical industries, at least not in this country in the last, oh, 70 years or so. Can you elaborate? Or were you meaning deregulation like what California did in the case of the power industry. That (...) (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR