Results 2041 – 2060 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
| (...) I did not go on about, but did not hide the fact. I mention it in my Lugnet page. I mention it and do not feel any need to hide it. I also have never mentioned what by graduate degrees are in. As for you being a doctor, so are my kids. My (...) (17 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| | Re: Aeroflot Antonov An-28
|
| --snip-- (...) I never denied it. Unlike you I'm usually aware of when I am or am not being rude. (...) No. Most would understand the difference. It takes a special sort of brain not to see the difference. The kind of brain that would also do (...) (17 years ago, 4-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) I think I understand your point, but, even so, I must say I don't think using that term is a good idea. (...) I would? I defer to your knowledge of the Israeli military - incidentally, I'm sure that's not the only thing about some of them that (...) (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| | Re: siggy testaroo
|
| (...) But it does make a point. I read a lot of old messages and it seems that there are some people here that want the forums to be what they want. If something does not fit their point of view about subject or style they let everyone know. Nazi (...) (17 years ago, 2-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.422)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) True, that. All sites have their troublemakers, or those who don't play well together. I mentioned Lugnet because unlike all other sites mentioned, there is no active moderation here - the only recourse is murfling, which happens rarely and (...) (18 years ago, 11-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) **sighs** I guess when one's hobby is a toy, there will be children involved! :) Personally, I think it's bad for the overall AFOL community. I'll grant you, (A) I'm still sort of new to the community (even with 37 years of LEGO under my (...) (18 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) I think that you misread me. I was referring to such an outlet that does allege that responsibility. I'm not referring to news outlets in general, which may or may not allege responsibility. Those seem to be two very different cases. (...) (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) Well, maybe if you're taking a totally uncritical look at it. As far as current scientific understanding goes, the process didn't unfold by having the Earth and seas and vegetation precede the formation of the Sun and Moon. Sure, we can blame (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| (...) Yes, we all have microwaves! I can throw mine a good 20 feet. :') (...) anything. (...) Libertarianism infringes on the rights of non-libertarians. (25 years ago, 17-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) I definitely disagree. If a private school wants to exclude any and all books from its premisis talking about Darwin's evolutionary theory, that's censorship! Everyone involved might be totally fine with it, and they might have made you aware (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.421)
|
|
| | Re: Bible as a literal source?
|
| (...) You obviously miss my point. I'm not arguing that my interpretation is the correct interpretation, merely that I can construct an interpretation of Genesis that disagrees with the facts as we know (insofar as we know anything) them. (...) If (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Nope. It comes back to the TOS. I can dig up the link if you'd like, but a year or so ago there was a big discussion regarding someone's ouster from Bricklink for violating the TOS of that site. Great was the outcry on his behalf, though I (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | What Censorship Isn't
|
| When a privately-owned website enforces the TOS to which posters have explicitly agreed, that's not censorship. If it results in posts being deleted, hidden, altered, or flagged in some way, it still isn't censorship. Alternatively, if it is (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I would trust you on this had you not brought up Animal Farm. (...) Where did I say you did? You dropped a comment on Animal Farm in reference to Doublespeak, I pointed out that it was from 1984 alone. (...) It doesn't have to mean the (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: DMCA
|
| (...) First off, it infringes on free usage rights. According to the normal copyright laws in the U.S., we have limited usage rights to other people's intellectual properties that allow us to quote, critique, distribute (with-out profit) them. The (...) (23 years ago, 8-Aug-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: What Censorship Isn't
|
| (...) Actually it doesn't have any such responsibility. It may be prudent to broadcast unaltered information (although it usually isn't, political slant is a good way to differentiate yourself from your competitors) but I'm willing to bet that if (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: Should AFOL websites keep to themselves?
|
| (...) I'll jump in here and (not having read the whole thread) I'm sure I'll state something that's blatantly obvious and has (probably) been stated-- Censorship is some form of management (parent/school board/society) *denying* access to some (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
|
| | Re: Bible as a literal source?
|
| (...) Then perhaps we are more closely in agreement than I had realized. (...) Well now you are assuming that I literally believe the Genesis account of creation, which would be a stretch. Given that Western cultures still believed that the Earth (...) (18 years ago, 13-Apr-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.420)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
