Debate : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Off-Topic / Debate / Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1861 – 1880 of about 12000.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) This is a debate forum-- perhaps try your luck in .fun, or .tiredliberalpropoganda... JOHN (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 1.979)

		Overview of Changes to Legal Rights
(URL) particularly heartening. (22 years ago, 11-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.979)

		Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
(...) Well, we already knew that, didn't we? Despite his putative support of states' rights, he's never missed the chance to curtail them. Man oh man is this a stupid ruling. Shame on the SCOTUS. Dave! (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.979)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes: [...] (...) OUCH! You are too much. John C (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes: [...] (...) Agreed. Unfortunately, with progressively debilitating diseases, the brain is often the first thing to go, and can be gone before you know what's happened or have a chance to do (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 14:18:59 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) I responded before seeing this bit! :o) Actually, in Europe(1) we do a rather crap job of provision of social care. Too many liberals and communists have (...) (25 years ago, 3-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
On Sat, 3 Jul 1999 08:50:13 GMT, Mike Stanley uttered the following profundities... (...) I wouldn't know the answers, either. And I agree, too many parents take too little interest in their children. However, where chronic underfunding exists in a (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 00:20:22 GMT, Mike Stanley uttered the following profundities... (...) Indeed it is, but no harm in asking should someone just happen to have them! (...) Prefer metacrawler...., but when back online will go for yours. (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:06:30 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) Requested on the off-chance someone had them? I do have a fair few documents from wiretap.spies or whatever it was called, I downloaded almost everything (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Good idea. You might at least want to take a step outside, and check the name on the shingle. This ng is supposed to be for debate. It occasionally gets hot, but rarely hostile. Steve (25 years ago, 8-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Actually, we had the same reasons. You just described it much better. Steve (25 years ago, 12-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) No kidding? Man, you're weird. (...) And? Nothing wroing with ad hominem attacks, if you can support them properly with your arguments. If they can't, it's just more ammunition to use against them. Win/win situation, really.. Jasper (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) That, I suppose, is the problem with the argument that those who deserve will get medical care through charity. You have too much faith in humanity. Jasper (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights to free goods? (was Re: What happened?
(...) Says who? The mere fact that I choose to make a post focusing on one side of the argument does not mean I concede the other. Far from it. The trouble is, we both start from opposite views of what is a right and what is not, and therefore, (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
(...) You or I can only hope to assist our kids in the education path which they choose. They can only make a choice from what is available. Educational planners are there to predict the needs of your country. At a low level, below are the aims of (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
(...) ROFL. This guy came runner-up in the LP man of the century! You using him for justification, is like Lenin using Marx (Not Groucho) to justify communism. You really are a critical thinker Larry, I am in awe. Argue your point with me Larry, be (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) Sheesh! -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) That's very nearly a 100% apocryphal statistic. Here's one addressing of the issue: (URL) but there countless others on the web and in print media that draw pretty much the same conclusion. I'm not worried about my Canadian friends who (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Your Rights, Your Money...
(...) Yes. If anyone cares to track it back, I posted about this some weeks ago -- esp. the offshore corporation scam. I repeat, corporations are granted special benefits as fictitious persons because they are supposed to provide a public good in (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

rights
(score: 1.978)

		Re: Is this sexism?
(...) Sorry if I wasn't being clear enough. I agree that rights aren't "what you are capable of enforcing". That's too amoral. Rights derive from fundamentals about people (and other reasoning moral beings should some be constructed or discovered in (...) (23 years ago, 1-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

rights
(score: 1.978)

More: Next Page >>