Results 1581 – 1600 of about 12000.
|
Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Perhaps they shouldn't have dumped stuff, which they didn't know what its effects might be, in an unsecured area. Think about how we handle radioactive waste. Some of it, we don't really know what effect it will have, so be bundle it up to (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Israel and Palestine
|
| (...) Just for my own edification, if a Jewish family could produce a legitimate deed from, say, eight or ten centuries ago documenting their ownership of a piece of property in modern Palestinian land, would you accept that deed as proof of their (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | The Supremes sing another sour note
|
| The state can favour one (presumably well connected) private individual over another, to the point of using eminent domain to take what rightfully belongs to one person and give it to another: (URL) enough, this time it was the "liberal" side that (...) (19 years ago, 24-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: New Web Page
|
| (...) Actually, unless theres an amendment I'm not aware of, you don't have the right to own a car. You have the opportunity to own a car, like any property, based on their availability and your financial capability. You can be granted the (...) (25 years ago, 18-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
| (...) Assuming we step into Libertopia, and you and Ed shack up, the government ought to treat you no differently than anyone else, right? He can inherit your property when you die, etc. What about corporations? Does ACME Insurance company have to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Keeping Larry Amused
|
| (...) Please elaborate. We each seem to have a perception that the other is wiggling. Why is that? (...) Not exactly. I'd state it as, responsible for some bad occurance on my property that was an accident, not as, responsible for the immigrant (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
| (...) Oh, I never said it was a good thing for them to do. I'm not sure how I feel about a government university limiting this particular activity on their property. Obviously it would be better if the university were not government in the first (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Trying to understand
|
| (...) (I can't believe I'm entering this debate, but...) How, exactly, would trigger locks save lives? Parents who leave loaded guns lying around are likely to leave the same loaded guns lying around with the keys in the trigger locks. Children who (...) (25 years ago, 15-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) And thank goodness he WASN'T state funded. Free money spoils people. If you don't want to suffer a bit for your art, you're not much of an artist, now are you? Note, that's a utilitarian argument against state funding... the art it produces is (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) Let's just stick to the normal usage/definition of words... not your distorted definition. I think this is pretty good: "Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the (...) (22 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Photo Radar
|
| I think you might be splitting hairs here. You're the vehicle owner. Unless it was stolen, you're responsible for what was done with the vehicle. Tell your drivers not to speed or they will have to pay the tickets and increased insurance costs for (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
| (...) They were on the toll walkway (no public sidewalks) and fell there as they died. Smugglers aren't involved because they weren't restricted at the border. Actually, they died on your neighbor's property, but he dragged the corpses over to yours (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: It IS about Taxation
|
| (...) Can it not be argued that by participating in the monetary system deployed by a government (in accordance, in the US, with the Constitution) a tax is simply a "service charge" for using goverment property (money)? That is, if you don't want to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) That's fine in a macroscopic sense, but it could easily mean that two whole populations of consumers get hosed in pursuit of that will-o-wisp named The Free Market. In my region, for instance, AT&T holds a de facto monopoly on cable service, (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| | Re: interest rates & "Economic Health"
|
| (...) (URL) (...) It signifies that prices are low so stuff is cheap, and getting money is cheap as well. (...) Borrow money and start a business or buy property! (...) How could they do that if we are taking their oil? (...) No. As it is now it is (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 1.989)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
