|
 | | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
| (...) Wow, John--this is one of those rare moments when you and I are in complete agreement (at least with the NEA part). I can think of absolutely no reason whatsoever that the government should provide public funding for artists. Having said that, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|  
property
(score: 0.527)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.527)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.526)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.526)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.526)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Chris wasn't saying the relationship is not propery. He was saying the contract is not a property, it is documentation of the agreement of what property is involved in the relationship and how to handle disolving the contract. Chris also added (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.525)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Why would the value of the relationship change depending on who took it away? Do other pieces of property change their value depending on who takes them away? (...) I don't think that matches with what you've said earlier: you declared the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.525)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: I've lost my train of thought on this bit though. (...) Absolutely - I've been trying to find some spare time to get in on this one for exactly the same reason. I've tried to raise 'is land property' at (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.525)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Yes, though a contract may be in place. I would tend to think that there is an implicit contract entered when the child is conceived. (...) Ok, point conceded. I've lost my train of thought on this bit though. Unfortunately this debate which I (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.525)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) No. There may be an agreement, but Frank said clearly in (URL) that "The relationships that make a family a family are property". The example of marriage may also have a contractual element which may also have value, but according to Frank's (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.525)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) I would agree with this refinement. It also better supports the idea that the wife terminating the relationship is different than a murderer terminating the relationship. (...) Right, it's not so much that the value of the relationship (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.524)
|
|
| |
|
property
(score: 0.524)
|
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) I would say yes. To some extent this is already covered by divorce law. I'm pretty sure I've also read about cases where someone sued their ex for basically this reason. I'm not sure one would win very often, but there certainly are cases (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.524)
|
|
| | Re: Brick Testament in Trouble?
|
| (...) I'm glad you put a winky there-- that is one of my hot buttons-- "artists" hiding behind the First Amendment while they purvey filth and obscenity-- and then *I* have to support it! (NEA in the US) (...) What about TLC's rights? You know, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.523)
|
|
| | Re: Posting for others. Now this is a good one.
|
| No need. But thanks. Nope, I was PBM on the old Bricklink. I am no more. I sell product off that system now! Much easier, and no hassles from the MODs or anyone else. They seem to like to confuse me with other stores! Happens all the time. They do (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.523)
|
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) Hong Kong is a city - it can't be compared to an entire country. Of which it is a part of, BTW. And I said OVER half of China is uninhabitaBLE, not uninhabitED - the last portion is even greater than the first. If you check where the majority (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
property
(score: 0.523)
|
|
| | Belgium & Norway [Re: What about the first?]
|
| (...) Who is "they"? The decision outlined above was taken by *Belgium's* "Supreme Court". As their name implies the "Norwegian Nobel Committee" is actually based in *NORWAY*. The prize was actually shared by Rabin, Arafat and Peres. Their work was (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.522)
|
|
| | Re: Bricklink MODs need to go!
|
| (...) Well, at least you've got all of that "Da Vinci Code" money coming in. Beyond that, I can't really hazard a guess about the actions of the mods. I've always found he BL discussion forum to abe generally welcoming, but the site itself is of (...) (15 years ago, 19-Feb-10, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.522)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.521)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.521)
|
