Subject:
|
Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 29 Dec 1999 20:27:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1154 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott E. Sanburn wrote:
> > In your original statement, you said "hose" when I assume you meant
> > "house". I was just making fun (sorry for being off-topic...)
>
> Oops, I did. Ugh, I can't wait to go to bed tonight! :)
Yea, sounds like you need some sleep, or you need to bow down to the
great Larry more so you don't make as many misteaks...
> I don't know what being more friendly to gays means, however.
Things like benefits for domestic partners, having personel policies
which state that the company doesn't descriminate on the basis of sexual
preference, advertising in gay lifestyle magazines etc.
Note also that IBM uses the same economic justifications for all
minorities.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
|
| (...) Oops, I did. Ugh, I can't wait to go to bed tonight! :) (...) Hmm.. that is interesting, I don't know how Libertarians would view that. I never thought that the first part was bad. I will have the great Larry P. on that one... I think the (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
