 | | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) It's just a turn of phrase. Richie Dulin CO Legeaux (16 years ago, 20-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) Not gone, I don't think, but not all that active anymore. DaveE (16 years ago, 19-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) I hear that he's an active overseer at Wikipedia now. (16 years ago, 19-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) And at least one of the .o-t curators seems to be long gone, but I could be wrong. Richie Dulin CO Legeaux (16 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) I wasn't sure that anybody actually reads o-t.d anymore. (16 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you think there are too many Lego® groups on Flickr?
|
|
(...) A good question, CM Bob. There certainly seems to be a lot of them these days, some of which seem to have a narrow focus (there's even one called 'LEGO® Complaining'!). At the moment I cope with the huge number of LEGO groups by the simple (...) (16 years ago, 18-Feb-09, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - The Book of Job
|
|
(...) A devastatingly brilliant member of LUGNET commented on this very subject a while back. Read his wisdom (URL) and be forever changed. Dave! (16 years ago, 27-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - The Book of Job
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Anders Franzén wrote: snippity (...) snip (...) At least 2 sources I've read claim it was a dragon. (URL) Here's one of them>. sjf (16 years ago, 26-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: The Brick Testament - The Book of Job
|
|
(...) Hi! When looking into The Book of Job again (latest Swedish version from 2000) I noted that, as you correctly says, Yahweh created Behemoth, not defeated it. I have read somewhere that Behemoth is a Hippopotamus, which fits well to Yahweh's (...) (16 years ago, 25-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) I'm sure you'll have at least two or three ways of getting in touch with me at that time... Dave! (16 years ago, 11-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) See, this is why people should never admit when they've made a mistake. And I will continue to ridicule the Myers-Briggs Test Instrument while there is breath in my lungs and blood in my veins, thank you very much. Dave! (16 years ago, 11-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) Oooo, there's still hope for Myers-Briggs! DaveE (16 years ago, 10-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) I'm not sure what to make of this; I'll get back to you in a few years. JOHN (16 years ago, 10-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) Well, it's not as though I was thinking about it every day, but it was sort of bubbling on the back burner, along with a hundred other random things. Jon Palmer's post in ot.pun was another of them, but I already commented on that one a while (...) (16 years ago, 8-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) It takes you FIVE YEARS to admit you're wrong, Dave!? Or have you just been thinking about the example for that long? I don't believe that you had even procreated before this discussion. ROFL JOHN (16 years ago, 7-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Ahh infinity, how I love ye! Was Re: George Bush has legitimised terrorism
|
|
(...) Okay, I've thought about it more. And I've decided that my example is 100% faulty. Even if such a theoretical perfect sphere could be said to exist in the real universe, there'd be no way for us to verify it, because we'd have no way to verify (...) (16 years ago, 6-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | need an illustrator for MOC
|
|
About 20 months ago, just as the presidential campaign was beginning, my husband, an environmental science teacher, conjured up a story ... his first in decades. It came to him as a way to cast historical events in a new light. His first strategy (...) (16 years ago, 5-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Problems in the Chinese toy industry
|
|
As I couldn't find any better place to put this (and its about the toy business in general, not about clones), I'll post it here... This is a general review of the toy manufacturing industry in China, and how it is being affected by the current (...) (16 years ago, 2-Nov-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Right place for questions about LUGNET configurations
|
|
(...) Thanks, I'm on my way! Jetro (16 years ago, 24-Oct-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Right place for questions about LUGNET configurations
|
|
(...) You might try LUGNET.ADMIN, which is where I've asked questions about my account in the past. Such as "why don't I get a dollar every time someone reads one of my posts?" Seriously, though--that's probably the best place to start asking. Dave! (16 years ago, 24-Oct-08, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
